Brighton Beachscapes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Brighton Beachscapes

Postby pharmer on Sun May 21, 2006 11:32 pm

Spent the afternoon shooting around Brighton Beach - nice dramatic clouds and light

The first two are landscapes/beachscapes - kind of a new area for me.

The last is the cliched flag hut - in supersaturation mode :-)

Image

Image

Image
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby pharmer on Mon May 22, 2006 2:07 pm

Another one looking a different way

Image
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Sir Tristram on Mon May 22, 2006 2:15 pm

I love all of these but number 3 just does it for me. The colours are great in 2 though. Well done.
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
User avatar
Sir Tristram
Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s

Postby pharmer on Mon May 22, 2006 6:04 pm

Anyone got any comments on these?

Its not my usual stuff and I'd like some feedback from landscape pros :-)

The seascapes were taken with the Sigma 10-20 with a 2 stop GND filter to keep the sky from burning out

Cheers
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby PiroStitch on Mon May 22, 2006 6:19 pm

Not a landscape pro myself but I like #2 out of the landscapes though I feel there's too much foreground and too little sky.

Mate, you should have been down that way on Saturday instead. I was down there and the sky was brilliant!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 22, 2006 6:25 pm

Bariie

I must confess I came here twice and didn't comment. #3 really scremed out at me and it's a great image, but I wasn't sure what my view on the other two were. So having considered - #1 doesn't work for me - it's just a pile of rocks with no real central focus (it took a while before I noticed the city in the background). #2 OTOH is heading in the right direction, but I'd have somehow liked a lower angle on this.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby owen on Mon May 22, 2006 6:38 pm

Number 2 is my favourite. Was this a blended exposure? If so you did a great job.

I like 1 but when my eyes get to the city and find the buildings leaning over it doesn't seem quite natural.

The 3rd one is a good shot too... simple but nice contrasting colours.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby pharmer on Mon May 22, 2006 6:41 pm

Thanks Peter, Owen and Wayne - just the type of comments I was looking for

Owen - no blended exposure on #2 - Graduated filter took care of the sky
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby katie on Mon May 22, 2006 10:20 pm

I love no.2 just in its own right....

... but for me, I grew up down that way and lived on that beach and others nearby as a kid, and no.1 just seems to capture it exactly the way I remember it... :-)

Loved it.

KA
katie
Newbie
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby stephen on Mon May 22, 2006 10:28 pm

#2 for me the colours in the rocks is amazing
#1 has a little too much rock for me
#3 not for me but that does not mean there is anything wrong with it
Cheers Stephen
stephen
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:10 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby pippin88 on Tue May 23, 2006 11:37 am

Peter's comments sum my feelings up nicely.

#3 is a cracker.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby Johnnie Hurrah on Wed May 24, 2006 11:02 pm

Beautiful colour in #2 and 3. Great feeling of flow in #2 - love that long sweep to the brooding sky.

Johnnie Hurrah
User avatar
Johnnie Hurrah
Newbie
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:48 pm
Location: Glenunga, Adelaide

Postby Jonas on Thu May 25, 2006 11:48 am

Great colours in #3. I thought maybe the wide angle lens is not the best pick for this type of shot as the lines bulge outwards (barrel distortion?) slightly.

But that's only a minor gripe. Great shot.
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70, Sigma 70-300DG APO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasphoto/
Jonas
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Miami, Gold Coast, QLD

Postby pharmer on Thu May 25, 2006 12:27 pm

Jonas wrote:Great colours in #3. I thought maybe the wide angle lens is not the best pick for this type of shot as the lines bulge outwards (barrel distortion?) slightly.

But that's only a minor gripe. Great shot.


Thanks, but it wasn't taken with a wide angle - 42mm in fact :-)

Wouldn't have helped that the side of the hut wasn't flat or even - but I certainly can't see a noticable bulge
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby admajic on Thu May 25, 2006 12:32 pm

Im no landscape expert either, but the angle on the first one seems a bit out. Get down low (like 40cm) from the ground and Im sure that shot would have turned out better.

2nd one also seems like you were standing up too high. But u have the 3 stages in the photo. Fore, mid and background. I like the sky and the forground. Maybe you could make 2 differnt photos from this one showing the more sky/less foreground and visa vera to see the diff.

The 3rd one is just great the blue is beaut!

Well done :lol:
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques