First take at portrait

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First take at portrait

Postby kamran on Mon May 22, 2006 10:02 pm

My first proper portrait.

Click the picture for a larger version.

Image


Comments are always welcome !
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Postby PiroStitch on Tue May 23, 2006 2:25 am

can you give us more details about the pic - lens, aperture, etc...

i can't tell whether the pic has been PP'd or if it's the setting used but to me it's a bit soft. judging by the fact that only her eyebrows are sharp and the rest of her face a bit softer, I'm going to take a potshot and say that the DOF is too short. I'd be more incline to have her whole face sharp than just a portion of it.

What I do like though is how you've managed to capture the highlights in the woman's eyes.

Very lovely lady and I'd suggest doing a reshoot :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby kamran on Tue May 23, 2006 8:57 am

Oh sorry ! I should have posted the picture data here (it's there on the image).

Lens = Nikkor Micro AF 105mm 2.8D
Focal Length = 105mm
Aperture = f/3
Shutter speed = 1/40
ISO = 350

In a room with white walls and ceiling. Wireless SB-800 at full power firing up at the ceiling.

As for PP, only the left side was retouched as there was an ugly bed frame that I had to clone out.
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Postby big pix on Tue May 23, 2006 9:24 am

nice lighting ........ but I find that the crop to my taste is a little too tight......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby gstark on Tue May 23, 2006 10:30 am

AsWayne has suggested, this image is very soft. Her eyebrows are in focus, but the rest of her fce - even her lips - are not.

Perhaps this is what you were seeking, but to my eyes it doesn't present as well as I think it could were more of the image in focus.

Stop the lens down to at least f/5.6 and reshoot, and see how that looks.

In fact, I'm rather puzzled by the exposure details on this image. SB800 at full power, fired at the ceiling, but f/3, 1/40 and ISO 350?

How big was the room? The exposure settings are suggesting a lot of light loss despite shooting at full power on the flash. Further, if the flash is the primary light source, 1/40 going to potentially be the cause of some image softness with the 105 because you may introduce some camera shake.

Unless there was some significant ambient light present, shooting at 1/125 or 1/250 might have been a better option.

Finally, could you please bring your signature line into line with our requirements here, which state that it may be no more than four lines. We feel that there's something wrong when a person's signature line is longer than their messages. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby mudder on Wed May 24, 2006 9:51 pm

G'day,

Just found this thread and as I don't think I've ever taken a photo of a person before (Ha, all my stuff is animals and landscape sort of stuff) and I"m doing a portrait workshop this week-end, so I wanted to have a sticky nose... I'll try to give my very, very portrait newbie virgin impressions :lol:

I don't know the first thing about portraiture (but looking forward to the week-end :) ) but this looks as though the focus is in front of the eyes, making the eyebrows and the tip of her nose look sharper than her eyes... I think if the focus was more on the eyeballs, this would work better for you, and bring up the eyelash details too...

Not sure about the framing/crop, maybe if the frame was just a smidge to the right to include the edge of her face and less open white background space on the left???

Not sure about multiple catchlights in the eyes, maybe tempted to cloen out the smaller one of each pair???... Terrific pose...

Take my ramblings with a grain of salt, just rabbiting on... Tis a lot better than I've done with a human :lol: Good stuff...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby kamran on Thu May 25, 2006 8:04 pm

It was a big room. Very high ceiling and very wide too. Very little ambient light. Also, the flash was placed quite far away from the subject. I wanted even illumination and I think this setup worked a bit.

As for the pic being soft, yep, that is what I intended too but somehow wasn't able to get it right. There's no camera shake in there but DOF was too shallow to get the lips sharp I guess.

As for the cropping, unfortunately, this is how it came out from the camera (a perfect exmample of bad composition and framing!). In fact, I added a little white area to the left myself (its perhaps best to remove it). I did try a few more times but wasn't able to get quite the pose I got the first time around. That was impromptu !

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. I will definitely retry the whole thing again someday.
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques