), but these are three that took my fancy.
24-120 VR
24-120 VR
70-200 VR
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Mudgee TrioModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mudgee Trio
Three very different pics from my Mudgee visit at the weekend. I have lots more to PP (I took 1300 shots
), but these are three that took my fancy.
24-120 VR
24-120 VR
70-200 VR Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I really like #3 Peter but with 1300 shots would you not be better off using a video camera
   Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Peter, all three are nice. The third one stands out for me, beautiful colours, nice bokeh, cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
.......now that's funny  at 60 frames per second
Maybe it's the National Geo theory at work....1 out of every thousand captures from a photog on assignment is chosen for publication.....so Peter should have a min of 1.3 National Geo quality captures 
No, Peter manages to see some things to capture that others might overlook....not many have that type of an eye. On another note....there is a young fella in my office who has a D70 and he shoots night club shots.....each time he goes out he shoots a min of 600 shots. The problem is he is just "pulling the trigger"....after a year of this he still has no clue what his camera can do or how to use....no disrespect to him as he is a really nice guy....but he doesn't seem to have learned much. I can go out of a weekend (take in mind only landscapes and longish exposures) and I will most likely shoot about 100 for the whole weekend. Personally....I don't have the kind of time to sift through hundreds and hundreds of pics....I'd rather take a few good ones. If I can get "1" good capture of the morning I am in all honesty very happy 
On the trip I shot less but carefully choosen what I aimed to and I usually achieved the high ratio of keeper. Shooting sport or action is difference way of shooting. But then in thousand of triggers, you may or may not earn a real good ones. Maybe Peter tries to find something to do or makes himself busy with his spare times to PP those 1300 shots till the next workshop at Stockton sand dunes shooting on the 29th July Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Peter - that last one (#3) is absolutely stunning, would love to see this enlarged, printed and framed - the colours are amazing mate. Keep this up!!
 Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Peter,
I like how #3 turned out - the D2x really latched on to the blue! I'll be interested to see how my version of #1 with the fisheye comes up with a bit of PP. I like what you've done with #1.
Thank you all for your comments. #3 is a great example of the superb bokeh of the 70-200 VR
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter,
once again you have seen what others have simply walked past. Well Done! Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
#3 is a superb shot Peter. The vibrant colour,contrast and DOF make it a winner of the three by a mile. Just can't wait to get my hands on the 70-200VR I ordered from Birdy
cheers marco
Steve, Marco - thanks.
Marco - you'll love the 70-200. Did you get the TC 1.7 as well? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Stubbsy said:
Yeah, I'm really looking forward to it. I decided against getting it first up thinking my money would be better spent saving up for another quality lens as I have the 80-400VR that I'm pretty happy with but it's tempting
cheers marco
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
