Going for the long shotModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Going for the long shotboth 6 min plus. Bit longer than I would normally go but trying to keep the ISO down.
Redhead Tower (no moon) <a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v292/Newidude/RedheadTower.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a> Caves Beach(full moon) <a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v292/Newidude/CavesBeach4.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a> Never argue with a fool. They will drag you down to there level, then beat you with experience.
Although I gotta admitt, sometimes it makes for a good laugh ![]()
Love the 2nd shot - it has a very surrel element to it whcih is quite eye catching...nice work. The first image doesn't compete
![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I like them both but the second one is special.
Great stuff - lovely photos Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
2nd is surreal and effective, I love the crisp rocks and contrast in the water colour.
Not enough interest in the sky in shot #1 for me, a few more star trails or some more colour would have helped ![]() So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
#2 is definitely the winner of the two, but both are nice long exposures. I agree with rooboy a bit more interest in the sky in #1 would of been useful.
Second one is just beautiful !!!!
I've got to have a go at doing this one day .... Just need to find some water ![]() Keep it up Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
I am for No. 2 mostly. I sit & wait for the dragon to rise from the mist!
No.1 is a little too much light. Try playing with levels on the foreground in PS if you can to add a bit more drama. It looks like it was hit with the mother of all flashguns! Maybe a little Dodge and Burn through the sky and adjust the colours there would do something. The sky doesn't bother me too much though. Something to play with on a winter's night. Overall, Berry nice indeed. ![]()
The 2nd pic does it for me as well..looks like a witch's cauldron.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|