

Thanks for your thoughts peeps!
Is this underexposed and sloppy?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Is this underexposed and sloppy?I found this really cool spot recently where a cannery burned down, and nature is slowly reclaiming the chunks of concrete and poles that are left over. Exposure was tricky as it was all backlit, so I had to do some postproduction. I'm wondering now if you think it's too dark, just right, too bright, and if the editing looks sloppy to you.
![]() ![]() Thanks for your thoughts peeps!
Excellent shots mate. The first one looks really good to me. I love the sky and the dark rocks and wood are a great contrast. WOW!
The second one is ok, but it looks like the grass is floating in the sky? The top edge is too bright. Love to see a colour ver too, of both. D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
Thanks.
I'm not too crazy about the colour versions I'm afraid. There is a lot of yellow in the sky, lots of greys and oranges in the rocks and in the concrete, and some greens in the grassies. Nothing really exciting though.
I tend to desaturate in Rawshooter, and then play with the white balance and the tint sliders, which I can usually use in conjunction with the the shadow and highlight sliders to get effects that I like. Then I dodge and burn in PS. I also do a little curves and a little USM etc.
On the one with the posts I couldn't figure out if I got them too dark, or not light enough. It's tricky when you're working with that sky, to make them jive.
Dooda, I'm not a huge fan of B&W but there are some places where it has it's place....these work very well in B&W to the point I cannot ebven say which one I like the most
![]() Very well done...you have some great shots here ![]()
Sorry Dug, I really don't like the HDR aesthetic. I see it all over flickr and in some cases I think it totally ruins a perfectly good photo.
These were all taken as the sun was setting, which is how I got really good light qualities in the sky. I'll have to post a couple more from the evening.
The first shot is awesome, well composed and exposed.
The sky looks great, you could tweak a little in Photoshop to get more details from the shadows. But like stated, its a great shot as is. Marty What does that button do....??
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|