Fiji Colour

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Fiji Colour

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:21 pm

I am pretty sure I haven't shared any of these shots on the forum, but I was bored and looking through my shots and found these three. They look great on my LCD so I hope they look semi decent on a calibrated monitor. Each of these shots is special to me because I can recall how calm and peaceful I was when I took them, not sure if any of that carrys across in the photos or not.

Sunrise
Image

Sunset
Image

Sunset on a different day.
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby daniel_r on Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:01 pm

Craig, on my calibrated monitor they sure do look good.

Out of a tough bunch to pick from, #2 is a winner.

It's got a lot of stuff working together to make it the standout - a silhouetted shoreline to provide form without distraction, liquid-metal like water which then draws you to what looks like a mountain range in the background - all of these draw you in to the centre of the image.

The cloud formation at the top also forms a "V" drawing you into the image from the top as well.

Your final exposure as present here in spot on with highlights and shadows appropriately controlled. The composition is equally as good.

Edit: Just noticed something - I think your JPEGs posted here are in the AdobeRGB colour space... and they look awesome in a colour space aware browser (safari) or opening them in Photoshop. I usually convert the colour space to sRGB before web export - see here
Last edited by daniel_r on Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby Geoff on Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:03 pm

Craig I'm with Dan on this, #2 is the winner here. If I was being ultra picky I'd like to see a little more detail (light wise) globally in this image, but after all it is sunset :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby wendellt on Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:11 pm

even though the 1st one is more complex and appealing in that way i liek the simplicity of 2

go craig master of mood
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby greencardigan on Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:16 pm

Nice work Craig. The clouds in #1 are spectacular.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Sir Tristram on Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 pm

My vote = #2

Great photo.
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
User avatar
Sir Tristram
Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s

Postby PiroStitch on Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:15 pm

I'm going to be a pain and say #3. I quite like it, but maybe crop to a square pic as the clouds are drawing me to the right side more due to their formation.

I like #2 as well for the simplicity and the fact that the sun looks like a nuclear explosion...I think that trumps the thermonuclear explosions from the SB800 :D

Btw, have shown my fiancé your Fiji pics and we're both looking forward to going there next year :D
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Steffen on Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:29 pm

Craig,
very nice, just what you expect from a Fiji trip :)

daniel_r wrote:Edit: Just noticed something - I think your JPEGs posted here are in the AdobeRGB colour space... and they look awesome in a colour space aware browser (safari) or opening them in Photoshop. I usually convert the colour space to sRGB before web export


One of my standard gripes. People, you really rob your images of impact by not considering that most people don't use CM aware web browsers. The majority of web browers quietly ignore the profile tags in your images. Most don't do any CM and just throw the RGB bits at a monitor that is (hopefully) somewhere near sRGB in response...

Compare for yourself, on the left is what a common web browser displays, on right is what a CM aware application makes of it (I know I've done this before, and after this I rest my case and promise to never bring it up again):

Image

With some images the difference is more dramatic than with others, but this is something to keep in mind :wink:

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:40 pm

Your right Daniel and Steffan, I was being slack, the first time I uploaded these was for a mate to download (and not for displaying on the web) so I kept them in adobe rgb, when it came to posting today I just linked to the same version and didn't upload new ones in the srgb colour space and steffan is right I all to commonly post in the wrong colour space and don't do much shots just, I'll try to behave myself in future :) The side by side comparison is a great example to btw. :lol:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby johnd on Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:49 pm

Wow, it does make a difference. Good tip Steffen.
Nice pics too Craig, #2 is my favourite.
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques