Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:44 pm
About a month ago i did another commercial fashion shoot up in queensland for Kidswear company Hula Girl. This one was easier because the brief was tighter
they specificially wanted a typical 'Esprit' looking campaign kids happy confident and carefree enjoying wearing the clothes. The age bracket is like 9 to 14
this is the first time i have used a reflector i often use a strobe for any lighting needs. Reflectors are good but they only work if you catch the light well, in the wind a huge reflector can move around, also when used on kids the light makes the kids squint, so you need to work real quick
all shot with the 28-70 f2.8 lens and a minolta light meter,
Hensel Porty Strobe and reflector Kit
older girls first, client wanted surf shots but there was no surf so i had to setup this posed shot instead
for this one i used the Strobe under the shade and i got a nicely exposed shot with beautiful tones, shot at f6. For the art direction i thought the scene should merge with the clothing assignment, usually this would create a messy image but in this case it works a charm
a gold reflector was used in this shot and i think it reaked havoc with rhe colour balance
i exposed for the backlit model in this shot, didn't care about the overexposed background a tradeoff in this sort of shot
the whole campaign can be found here
http://www.hulagirl.com.au
.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by BBJ on Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:54 pm
wendelt, mate damn these would make great pics for the families of these children, i know they are for fashion pics but hell you are The Master at this and i enjoy looking at the pics you come up with. Well done mate you deserve a big pat on the back.
Cheers
John
BBJ
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by admajic on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:19 pm
Your experience is showing here buddy! Awesome shots. One day I wish I was half as good as you 
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
-

admajic
- Member
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction
by Link on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:27 pm
Nice shots, thanks for sharing... My favourite is definitely #3, great expression and exposure! Maybe the framing could have been a bit different, so as to include her legs too.
Link.
-

Link
- Member
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: Nowra
by birddog114 on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:42 pm
Now you told me you were using Minolta lightmeter
Did I advise you long time ago to use the lightmeter to achieve more nice results when shooting outdoor, modeling works rather than use the one in the camera? and you said: NO 
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:51 pm
birddog114 wrote:Now you told me you were using Minolta lightmeter Did I advise you long time ago to use the lightmeter to achieve more nice results when shooting outdoor, modeling works rather than use the one in the camera? and you said: NO 
birdy i did not say no i was misinformed, why cross reference me?
I may have casually said i dont need a expensive minolta light meter at the time i bought a $7000 camera
but now that i have the cam and some money i am more open to the piurchase of a external light meter
thanks for your support
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by birddog114 on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:53 pm
wendellt wrote:birddog114 wrote:Now you told me you were using Minolta lightmeter Did I advise you long time ago to use the lightmeter to achieve more nice results when shooting outdoor, modeling works rather than use the one in the camera? and you said: NO 
birdy i did not say no i was misinformed, why cross reference me? I may have casually said i dont need a expensive minolta light meter at the time i bought a $7000 camera but now that i have the cam and some money i am more open to the piurchase of a external light meter thanks for your support
Ok, now next one is lusting the lightmeter? your new goal? 
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:55 pm
birddog114 wrote:wendellt wrote:birddog114 wrote:Now you told me you were using Minolta lightmeter Did I advise you long time ago to use the lightmeter to achieve more nice results when shooting outdoor, modeling works rather than use the one in the camera? and you said: NO 
birdy i did not say no i was misinformed, why cross reference me? I may have casually said i dont need a expensive minolta light meter at the time i bought a $7000 camera but now that i have the cam and some money i am more open to the piurchase of a external light meter thanks for your support
Ok, now next one is lusting the lightmeter? your new goal? 
i already have the light meter
next goal is a fully setup studio with 10 strobes
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by LostDingo on Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:21 pm
1st and second shots are both great but #2 really takes the cake, great lighting, great tones...all very good
Regarding light meters.....what's the opinion over which meter is most preferred? Minolta? Sekonic? etc etc...??
-

LostDingo
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
- Location: Rozelle
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:25 pm
LostDingo wrote:1st and second shots are both great but #2 really takes the cake, great lighting, great tones...all very good
Regarding light meters.....what's the opinion over which meter is most preferred? Minolta? Sekonic? etc etc...??
I have no idea my lighting guy suggested the minolta.
metering on the d2x doesn't help when your using the strobe
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Alex on Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:26 pm
Great photos, Wendell.
As was said, you are a master of this style.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by Geoff on Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:29 pm
Fantastic again Wendell!!!
When you have your studio setup and want someone to come and take a look - remember me, I'm putting my hand up first 
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by birddog114 on Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:57 pm
LostDingo wrote: Regarding light meters.....what's the opinion over which meter is most preferred? Minolta? Sekonic? etc etc...??
Paul,
I have a Sekonic and it's superb! cheap to own but high spec. and quality.
Want to try? pick it up at the next mini meet.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by glamy on Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:09 pm
I had mine the other day at the beach and Paul laughed at me  . At the beginning there was not enough light to meter, it does not work beyond 2 minutes...
-

glamy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
- Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X
by Steffen on Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:18 pm
birddog114 wrote:I have a Sekonic and it's superb! cheap to own but high spec. and quality.
What does it do a DSLR + Expodisk (used as incident meter) can't? Just wondering...
Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
-

Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by blacknstormy on Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:23 pm
Wendell - superb as always !
I personally love #1 - beautifully set up. With the OOF girl in the foreground, the shot feels almost candid (as I'm sure it is supposed to).
Brilliant  Maybe you should come up to sunny Qld and give us some pointers?????
Rel
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:40 pm
blacknstormy wrote:Wendell - superb as always ! I personally love #1 - beautifully set up. With the OOF girl in the foreground, the shot feels almost candid (as I'm sure it is supposed to). Brilliant  Maybe you should come up to sunny Qld and give us some pointers?????  Rel
hi rel
i would be glad to give out some pointers, next tiem i should be more organised but i pretty much flew there did the funky thang and then flew back
1.
amuse and entertain, the more fun, the easier it is for all parties
2. work with good light
3 most important know your subject and understand it
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Mitchell on Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:41 am
Your style is very evident in these shots - they look great.
#1 is my favourite, wonderful candid pose, art direction is spot on
#2 is a bit busy, but the lighting adds some serenity to the model and it works
#3 I think is the weakest - the pose looks a bit forced, and the colours aren't quite right (as you mentioned)
#4 is excellent. The blown highlights add some drama, and the pose in this is spot on.
Great work Wendell.
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by birddog114 on Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:40 am
Steffen wrote:birddog114 wrote:I have a Sekonic and it's superb! cheap to own but high spec. and quality.
What does it do a DSLR + Expodisk (used as incident meter) can't? Just wondering...  Cheers Steffen.
ED used as an incident light meter! Correct, but within its boundary and restriction, very good for indoor with mixed lighting, outdoor is quite OK but not superb as real lightmeter.
Lightmeter is also an incident lightmeter, it gives you more flexibility in taking correctly of the calculation or the set up in number as A or F, perfectly in M or with MF lens, required when shooting in modeling, studio.
With lighmeter, you can stand next to the model and hold it in front of her face (model) with the read out of correct exposure for flash uses and camera setting in distance, say: 3m, 4m, or 5m or more.
Have you ever seen anyone shooting model works with 400 or 500mm lens? and his assistance holds the lightmeter at the model at about 10 or 15 or 20 meters away with a two way radios, talks to the photographer.
Some of them use the PW and lightmeter with a PW modules installed to transmit the exposure required directly to the camera and controlled by the PW.
I hope I'll have a chance to bring you guys in one of these shooting.
ED just provides the calculation in general of the shooting scene, not quite accurately on certain subject which you want to capture.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by daniel_r on Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:16 pm
#1 is a winner here Wendell.
They're quite identifiable as your work and style.
-

daniel_r
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|