Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Willy wombat on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:02 pm
Hi guys
Im interested in your thoughts on these two versions of this image. Please let me know which one you prefer (or dont)
[img]http://www.fototime.com/{3BDB749D-1881-43A7-B442-AE05C12D1A86}/picture.JPG[/img]
[img]http://www.fototime.com/{996D647E-4BB8-49B1-BF7F-69A99E4DFBA5}/picture.JPG[/img]
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
by Sir Tristram on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:13 pm
# 1 for me. The reds interest my eye. Don't know why, just does. 
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
-

Sir Tristram
- Member
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
- Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s
-
by christiand on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:13 pm
Hi WW,
I think the first image is under exposed and lacks of oomph.
The second one doesn't pay respect to the fact that it is a wooden priest.
I'd personally try to improve the first one; get more about the wooden thingy.
Cheers,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by Willy wombat on Tue Jul 04, 2006 11:26 pm
Christian and Tristram - thanks for the feedback. I might delve back into the level histogram to have a little look at the exposure in #1  . And if anyone else has something to add, please post it up.
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|