Cemetary Pt 2 (Colour)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Cemetary Pt 2 (Colour)

Postby stubbsy on Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:11 pm

Some more pics from the cemetary near La Perouse. Unlike Part 1, these are in colour. All images were taken with the 70-200 VR lens. For more images CLICK HERE

Image

Image

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby wendellt on Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:46 pm

all quality

like the fill flash and dof + mood effect in the last
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alex on Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:34 pm

Really like the colours in the last one. Personally, I'd prefer to see No.1 a bit rotate it to make the tumbstone straigt.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:47 pm

Wendell, Alex thanks for the comments.

Wendell - no fill flash in the last one, natural light plus some layering & dodging to lighten the foreground status

Alex. I tried rotating #1 when I PPd it, but the perspective didn't work (it was shot on an angle)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:58 pm

1 & 4 for me. I am a little dissapointed by the sharpness of the angel in 2 compared to its granite plinth.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby radar on Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:32 pm

Hi Peter,

I like these as well. I didn't get to comment on your b&W ones, but I did like them as well :)

#1 would be the fav for these ones,

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:58 pm

Certainly #4 Peter but they do not compare to the excellent B&W’s :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Dargan on Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:36 pm

It seems hard not to take a good image with the 70-200 VR. I think :roll: it was Ken Rockwell who said he looked best at the world in this lens range. I too prefer the BW set but #4 is my pick for the way this lens gives that lovely out of focus background.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby Murray1006 on Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:58 pm

They are all strong images but #4 would have to be my pick. #3 has a good Gothic feel to it. Did you use a 3rd party filter or is this your own doing? I like the effect.
Nice work.
Regards,
Murray
___________________________________
User avatar
Murray1006
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Warriewood, Sydney - Canon 30D

Postby Steffen on Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:01 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Certainly #4 Peter but they do not compare to the excellent B&W’s :wink:


I totally agree.

Gosh, cemetary shoots seem to be en vogue lately, and a lot of them are absolutely top. Maybe we should organise a cemetary micomeet. Preferably at dawn, otherwise we might turn too many heads... :lol:

I might just go across the road from work during lunchtime one day, we've got a massive cemetary there. Care to join me Paul?

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:03 pm

Thank you all for your comments.

Murray - glad you liked #3. I wanted a slightly different look for this one. I used a Nik Color Efex Cross Process E6 to C41 filter than added a Vignette Blur from the same filter set to draw the eye to the centre of the image.

I must say I agree with comments about my black and white set being better. I think the monochromatic colours oif headstones and the like are well suited to a B & W treatment.

Interestingly #4 was in my rejects pile originally as it was very dark. At the last minute I decided to do some serious PP to fix it.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby huynhie on Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:25 pm

The third one doesn't do much for me Peter, but your last image makes up for it. :)
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby mark on Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:35 pm

Hi Peter,

I like the B&W's in your other post best, the pick being #3
In this set however, I prefer #1 & #4 for the background colours, particually the blue water? in #1. Nice :wink:
User avatar
mark
Member
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Byron Bay | Northern NSW

Postby marcotrov on Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:32 pm

Another nice set of images and a totally different feel in colour and composition. Unquestionably #4(Gorgeous lighting, contrast between sky's muted tones and the shadows at the feet of the headstones) and #1 )gorgeous complementary colours and terrific angled sidelighting) are the picks here. #3 doesn't do a whole lot for me I'm afraid :( Then again it's battling with good company on either side. :wink:
If I were to nitpick, and I am :) , I would have probably tried to move your camera perspective by moving your position to the right from the position you chose so that:-
1) the central image is closer to that magic golden mean location
2) the image's facial perspective would appear to face into more space &
3) taken out of frame that contradictory Light post (or weirdest looking headstone I have ever seen) in the far right side of the image out of frame. As said peter I am being nit picky here. Love this image :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby ozimax on Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:17 pm

Now these are excellent, I like colour better than BW but that's just me, the first one with several blue tones stands out in my opinion, striking.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby rokkstar on Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:20 pm

number 4 for me here Peter.
Closely followed by number 2. Love the DOF on both of these. Colours are great.

I like the story in 3 a great deal, but find that it and 2 don't hold my attention as much as the other two.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:42 am

Matt You have me confused. You like #2, but it doesn't hold your attention. My guess is one of these should be #1 :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques