



Captive CrittersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Captive CrittersI went to Taronga Zoo a few weeks back, but have only just started PP. here are some that caught my eye. The first shot was taken with my 24-120VR, the rest with my 70-200VR.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter
On my ...new...monitor, the colours of all the images appear heavily saturated. They don't look natural. I'm guessing you are using a new software routine on these pics. The other thing that seems to distract is that they are so tightly cropped that there is no space for the image to express itself. You have caged the images and they look uncomfortable. Step back a little and let them breath. If they have merit then the viewer will take the time to find it...you don't have to put a big red arrow on your subjects. I hope this makes sense to you? In regard to image #1 take a good look and see if you can find the compositional lines of direction...where do they lead the eye? Out of the picture? That is why the image has little visual tension. It bleeds out along those lines. There is no point of interest strong enough to arrest that. PS I'm trying to make you think about the image and examine its structure. Regards
Matt. K
Peter,
Glad you enjoyed your day at Taronga Zoo. When I was a birdkeeper there back in 1989-90, I was surrounded by these critters 5 days a week and it was fantastic. I like shot no. 2 especially, but I also agree that there is way too much blue. Cheers Michael
Hi Peter,
#1 is a bit too "jumbled" up together, Matt said it well. #2 like this one except for being a bit too blue and cutting off its nose #3 I like, nice portrait of the giraffe. #4 I find there are too many legs ![]() But that's all IMHO, still was a great day I'm sure. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Chris, Matt, Michael, André
Thanks for your critiques. Having reflected on this I went back and redid the PP on the first 3 of these and have discarded the fourth. I've created a new thread showing the results HERE Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|