Path to Inner Peace

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Path to Inner Peace

Postby leek on Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:57 pm

I finally found some time to go out and have a play with my D200... and I actually managed to find some blue sky in Sydney today :lol:

I've driven past this beautiful landmark many times, but have never taken the trouble to stop & have a look... Today I did...

I have to say that the building is slightly less spectacular close up than when seen from a distance, but beautiful & peaceful nevertheless...

I had a play with the rapid-fire exposure bracketing on the D200 and took 3 images hand-held, 0EV, -1EV & +1EV. The Tokina 12-24 & a CPL were used...

I merged the 3 images to HDR in PS and then compensated for the distortion... I ended up with this, which I'm quite pleased with...

Image

Here's the 0EV image with minimal processing, so you can see the difference...

Image

The highlights at the top-right of the dome in the HDR version are a little blown, but what do people think???

P.S. I think it's about time that I calibrated my monitors again... The main pic looks OK on one and extremely dark on the other - what do other people see?
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Dug on Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:01 pm

looks fine to me especially for a hand held HDR :shock:

well done
Way to much photography gear is never enough!
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby Murray1006 on Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:15 pm

Nice image. I'm in Warriewood so I can just about see the temple from my balcony. I've taken a few pictures of the temple by moonlight which turned out quite well.
On my monitor the foreground is very dark and has lost most of it's detail. I'd be tempted to try and lighten the area or crop it out. You've chosen a hard subject to get right though. The blue sky is nice but you then have to deal with the strong sunlight. You have to compromise somewhere and have done a pretty good job.
Regards,
Murray
___________________________________
User avatar
Murray1006
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Warriewood, Sydney - Canon 30D

Postby wendellt on Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:28 pm

i like the tone of the 2nd one
if you just straighten it up a little that would be charming
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Pa on Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:30 pm

hi john. to me it looks as if it's leaning to the left a little, i also think if you crop some of the shadow off the bottom you would have a winner.
cheers pa
cheers pa

http://pa.smugmug.com

Work it's part of your life.....So make it an enjoyable part of it.
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby LostDingo on Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:34 pm

John, I am like you in it appears less spectacular upon closer proximity. From a distance on the hill it just looks that much more massive but now does not appear quite so large?
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby leek on Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:02 pm

Pa wrote:hi john. to me it looks as if it's leaning to the left a little, i also think if you crop some of the shadow off the bottom you would have a winner.
cheers pa


Pa... The first one is pretty damn straight according to my rulers, but the second one is uncorrected and is 1 degree off...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby in1way on Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:18 pm

I like the result you have achieved here, on my monitor the forground is a little subdued but it adds to the image imo.....very nice.
I haven't seen this temple for an eon, used to pass this on my way to Whale Beach........too many moons ago to even want to think about it. :(
User avatar
in1way
Newbie
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Werrington Downs, Sydney

Postby Dargan on Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:28 pm

John, I was just reading something about HDR and Photoshop today and it mentioned that to use HDR effectively it requires at least 5-7 images (or more) and that manual as opposed to autofocus is best used. It seems to me you used the auto bracket function in the D200 to bracket. Can the D200 bracket more than three images at a time? To get greater dynamic range you will have to use a tripod and many more images. I think the buildings shape is worth the effort to do so, as this would require a bit of an expedition. :D I'm surprised it isn't in the form of a lotus like the headquarters in Delhi. :)
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby leek on Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:56 pm

Dargan wrote:Can the D200 bracket more than three images at a time?


Yep, the D200 can bracket up to 9 images with +/- 0.3, 0.7 or 1 EV each time... That should cover any innacuracies in the metering :lol:

Of course, I would only attempt that with a tripod and a cable release...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby rooboy on Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:17 am

HDR looks great here, any more shadow detail and it would start to appear unrealistic. Nice leading lines in the foreground. Blown areas of the dome don't bother me - again, this is what my eyes expect in a scene with huge DR. Good shot :)
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby leek on Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:13 pm

rooboy wrote:HDR looks great here, any more shadow detail and it would start to appear unrealistic. Nice leading lines in the foreground. Blown areas of the dome don't bother me - again, this is what my eyes expect in a scene with huge DR. Good shot :)


Thanks Patrick...
Yep - it was an interesting exercise in trying out both my D200 and PS HDR which I haven't used seriously before...
The result - pretty much what I saw at the time...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Justin on Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:45 pm

Hi leek / all, any pointers for a good guide for the HDR process, I have some picture series I would like to try this effect on.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Glen on Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:04 pm

John, great result. Shows the benefit of your skills, the D200 and HDR.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques