Subtle

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Subtle

Postby Slider on Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:11 pm

Picked up an old Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 off ebay for a pitance and thought I'd have a play with the extension tubes with it.

The lens is fully manual (aperture and focus) but it is now the fastest lens I have and may come in handy in low light where flash is inappropriate.

This shot was taken in quite a dark area of the grevillea. I thought the very limited DOF gave a nice subtle and pastel feel.

Iso 200
1/160s @ f/1.4

Image
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Dargan on Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:30 pm

MArk, Lovely colour. Did the extension tubes come with the deal? Are they Kenko or Nikkor? The depth of field is the issue with these shots though. Fiddling with the PB6 I faced even worse depth of field challenges. I am thinking of the R1 package for it to allow smaller aperture and more depth.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:33 pm

Very nice Mark - is that the 50mm f/1.4 Ais :?:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Slider on Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:05 am

Dargan wrote:MArk, Lovely colour. Did the extension tubes come with the deal? Are they Kenko or Nikkor?


Thanks Michael. I already had the tubes which are "Glanz Triplus"

sirhc55 wrote:Very nice Mark - is that the 50mm f/1.4 Ais :?:


Thanks Chris. This is the lens. It does seem a bit tight (the aperture ring is seems to touch the camera) when fitted direct to the camera but fits easily onto the extension tubes. Have to work on that.

Image
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:19 am

That is the earlier S model - they came in two forms - fine aperture ring or ribbed. Serial # 403283 would have been made between 1964 and 1966 and comes within the range 396566 and 454363.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby gstark on Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:02 am

Mark,

That is sweet. Pre AI even.

Our pre-AI 55 micro is also tight, but .... :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Slider on Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:41 am

Thanks for the info Chris. One of the reasons I chose Nikon over Canon was the ability to use older lenses and this sure backs up that decision :-)



gstark wrote:Mark,

That is sweet. Pre AI even.

Our pre-AI 55 micro is also tight, but .... :)


Gary,

The aperture ring is almost impossible to move with the lens mounted to the camera. Any workaround you know of? I thought about having a few thou shaved off where it comes in contact with the body.
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby gstark on Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:30 am

Mark,

Sorry, no. We just deal with it. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Slider on Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:42 pm

I guess for $57.00 I can live with a few limitations :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Finch on Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:12 pm

Mark,

It may be an old lens but it still takes sharp pics. You scored a bargain there, mate :P

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane

Postby SteveGriffin on Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:30 pm

Mark,
I may on the wrong track here but I think that if you use a pk-11a extention you will find that the you will get around the aperture ring binding issues.

There have been a few bargains on ebay recently. I scored a PB-6 bellows and PS-6 slide copying adaptor for $175 a couple of weeks ago out of Alaska. Looks like it had never been out of the box. Looking for a lens with a bit more length than the Nikkor 60 now.
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby Slider on Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:31 pm

Thanks Steve. I'll look into that. Though, it does seem to focus OK when on the camera so I would think any extension would present problems focusing at infinity. Worth a look though :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Dargan on Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:57 pm

Makes me wonder if this 50mm 1.4 is a sharper lens than the later digital 50mm 1.4? It looks better built.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby Slider on Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:03 am

Michael, it is very solid. I haven't really had a chance to have a play on camera with no extension tubes but when I do I will post the results. :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby DionM on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:05 pm

Slider wrote:Thanks for the info Chris. One of the reasons I chose Nikon over Canon was so when my photos came out bad I could blame the equipment


:wink:

Very nice shot Mark. Definately subtle and has appeal on many levels.

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques