a question of scale?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

a question of scale?

Postby wendellt on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:22 pm

i was clearign out my hard disk, found this image i took in paris last year
i obviously missed it when i was editing my set because i view thumbnails and edit from there

so i was under the impression that a strong photograph is one that can scale so the subject is pretty obvious even when the photo is seen small. I have always tried to take a photo with this in mind

Image

in this case this image is quite abstract it has a lot of subtle detail and obscured by high contrast, when viewed small looks like nothing really

I printed this thing out and the overall look was like 10 times better than the one on screen. I don't normally print things out

so does scale affect the perception of an image?

of course this large example doesn't translate as well when compared to a printed version but it gives you an idea

http://www.zeduce.org/images/paris2005/parisScale2.jpg
.
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Justin on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:37 pm

Scale affects perception absolutely - my images all look FANTASTIC in the viewfinder, and when at 65% on my monitor they are soon headed to the trash.

Small is good to hide a bit of blur or out of focus 8)

Very good exposure BTW - the reflection of the street is right on the cusp of blowing out, and great of clarity almost to furthest part of the shot
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby macka on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:43 pm

I think you've proved your own theory wrong here, Wendell. When I vote on DP Challenges I see lots of images that don't look that interesting as thumbnails, but are really quie impressive when you take the time to view the larger size. Just about anything with fine detail, for example.

I really like this shot, it shows what those narrow little French streets are really like. It's nice the way your eyes are led down the street to the figure crossing the road, and it kind of makes you wonder what's around the corner.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby big pix on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:46 pm

the image here is just fantastic, reminds me of work from the 40s and 50s and very early Paris pixs....... I agree with you that it would look better much larger, hence big viewing monitors do help a lot.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby moggy on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:49 pm

Nice shot Wendell, I have the same problem with thumbnails not looking the goods untill I enlarge them. I really like the detail in this shot. :wink:

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby ozimax on Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:36 pm

I like this shot, I really enjoy city street scapes of all sorts, especially in BW.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby admajic on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:43 pm

Wendell. I like the enlarged ver too makes a big diff. Only thing is, it seems the higlights on the street are blown or close to it and give me a distraction, like glare. Hope this helps. As you can tell all great images lead the eye of the viewer on a journey through your pic. So naturally my eye should start at the bottom of the street and wander up it to the small ppl at the end. The buildings in this image give help that journey too. Thats what I see anyway. Bah! Sorry for rambelling :P
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby kamran on Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:13 am

Nice shot. Were you using a CPL filter? I'm sure it would have helped in keeping that bright glare on the street in control.
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques