Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Hyena on Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Yeah my turn to post a "my first pics thread"
Feel free to rip me to shreds
One main question, do these look a little under exposed ? (mainly the first 2)
As per one of my other threads, the metering on my camera seems to be out of whack and it has intermittent BGLOD symptoms but until I get it fixed I've been playing with the settings manually to try and get a decent picture. In aperture priority mode it seems to be way too under exposed so I flicked to manual and dropped the shutter speed down but I'm still getting used to the camera, and how much faith I should put in the small image on the LCD and the histogram.
Anyway here's a few pics I took in the national park across the road from my house today:
(post processing is minimal, a little sharpening and increase in saturation)
This last one is probably a little uninteresting but it looked good at the time and I snapped dozens of shots trying to get the water drip just as it hit the surface.

-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by Manta on Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:28 pm
Nice first efforts Hyena!
Exposure seems okay on 1 and 3 but 2 and 4 are pretty dark and murky. Easily fixed if you shot in RAW.
Might have been better to close up a bit on that drip, if you had enough dry land to do so. As it is, your subject is lost against all the dull stuff.
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by Justin on Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:55 pm
Hi,
I found on aperture priority the same thing - I felt the shots were 'underexposed'. This is the camera trying to preserve the highlights.
Good use of DOF in all of these. The first is the best composition
Try this trick in PS if you have it - go into the 'curves' box and drag the bottom left horizontally about one box and top right horizontally about one box - this has the effect of lightening the lights and darkening the darks, so to speak!
Also, just run an auto levels/color/contrast should make them pop out a bit more!
Edit: Picasa2 also has some great tuning features - 'I'm feeling lucky' will automatically enhance an average photo
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4 picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
-

Justin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Newtown, Sydeny
-
by Manta on Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:15 pm
Justin wrote:Try this trick in PS if you have it - go into the 'curves' box and drag the bottom left horizontally about one box and top right horizontally about one box
Try the same in LAB colour, dragging in the points in both the A and B channels. Does great things for your colours but don't go overboard with it!
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by Justin on Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:12 pm
Manta - correct! I knew there was a step I was forgetting!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4 picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
-

Justin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Newtown, Sydeny
-
by Hyena on Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:23 pm
Manta wrote:Might have been better to close up a bit on that drip, if you had enough dry land to do so.
Yeah I was at the limit of dry land and the kit lens zoom on that one. Light and dark issues aside I don't think I captured the scene very well, it looked much better at the time with the sunny reflection of the water drips on the top ledge of the sandstone. Oh well, it was good hand-eye-shutter co-ordination practise
I haven't started playing around with photoshop yet, I'm still using an older program I'm used to (ulead photoimpact) but I'll start getting my head around the different features of PS shortly.
Justin, it's good to know that the shots often appear underexposed in aperture priority mode and it's not just me or the way I'm going about things 
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by the foto fanatic on Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:49 pm
Hello Jay
I think the first three images are very good, but I agree with Manta on the last one.
Exposure seems OK - maybe #2 is a tad flat (ie needs more contrast).
You have some good colours, shapes and textures happening. Well done. 
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by Willy wombat on Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:05 pm
Good first efforts. I do like a good botanical. Natives to boot!
I love the concept of the last shot but tricky to capture and correctly expose all the elements.
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|