
Cockle Bay WharfModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Cockle Bay WharfMultiple exposures, to expose for the darker bits and the lighter bits, a wider range than bracketing
![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Justin - I think this is too busy a shot - sorry
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
That's just what Liz (my partner) said not 5 minutes ago.
For me it was a technical achievement - 3 exposures at very different shutter speeds - you can see indoors and the lights aren't blown on the outside. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Great technically Justin - just wrong subject Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I echo Peter's thoughts, the exposure blend is cool, but there is just too much going on in the shot..
i tend to agree with the busyness of it all. but good work on the multi exposures.
i have been meaning to try this myself. did you follow any guides to put all the mutliple exposures together?
White balance set at flourescent and it still comes out like this. It is all dark wood and red brick pavement. the whites are white and blues are true
![]() For my exposure guide for the multiple exposures it went something like this - At f8 ISO 100 the exposure meter said 2s. So I think i did one at 6s to get the interior detail, one at 2s and and the last at 2/3s, with the longest first (the intention being the next shots overlay and cool down any blown highlights). 2s f/8.0 at 44.0mm iso100 is the EXIF All I have to do now is find a good subject d'oh! D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
thanks!. im going to give this a shot once i find a decent subject. i can also back u up with the colour, everything there is wood and red pavers. very hard to get any other colour than the reddy brown that dominates the picture. i went there not long ago and got the same colouring for that area.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|