

Studio portraitsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Studio portraitsI had to set up a makeshift studio and ended up taking 148 portraits over 3 hours! The room was very narrow and I had a horrendous time getting the lighting set to my satisfaction...in the end forced to bounce a light off a yellow ceiling and colour correct in Photoshop. I could not have done this using film and would have been forced to accept shadows on the background, or shoot in B&W.
![]() ![]() Regards
Matt. K
These are great, I like them both but the smile on the lady in the first shots stands out to me.
thanks Fuji Finepix s9500>>>D70s 18-70 lens
You poms love dressing up in silly clothes! lol Good shots, that's where digital is so good with the feedback you get. Chris
Matt
Superb quality shots from a real pro on show here. The processing in the first one in particular is very much on the money (Quadtone?) and the vibrance and colour of the second enhances the wonderfully whimsical nature of the shot. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|