First image post up for bombardment

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First image post up for bombardment

Postby Viz on Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:20 am

Incongruous - yes, but they sum up my weekend testing the 105 vr. Here is my first image post ever, of weekend in the Blue Mountains.

C+C welcome

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Postby cawdor on Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:06 pm

Nice shots all around, I'm amazed how much pollen the bee carries around :)

Now for the picky stuff: shot #1 thereseem to be some blown highlights on the woman's neck, and also she looks a bit worried. Maybe you could have relaxed her more to get a better expression - unless you were going for this one of course!

Shot #3 is great, I'd have liked a bit more DOF to have all the metal bits in focus. What was the object?

Like I said, nice shots to look at, well done.
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
cawdor
Member
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Viz on Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:25 pm

Thanks Cawdor
No. 1 is my Grandmother, or Mumi... and she is worried that the sky will someday fall on her head - so I chose it because it says more to me than a coaxed smile - though I know she doesn't agree - so don't please tell her I posted this.

No. 3 is a join in the drive belt of an old wood lathe, and I agree wholeheartedly about the DOF. I seriously spent about 10 secs shooting it. It looks like it will be there for a while yet if I want to get more shots in the future.
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Contrast

Postby zafra52 on Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:18 pm

Try to play with the contrast in your B&W picture. I normally play with the channels in PP till I get the best I can get. Pictures 2 & 3 are good as they are - as far as I am concerned they are very good.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4861
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Viz on Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:39 pm

Thanks, now I'm re-evaluating the first image - those hilights are blown and I was shooting in the highly controversial JPG format... :) so they are gone. And as for the contrast - I was using the technique of having 2 hue saturation layers, the top one desaturated, and playing with the lightness values for various colour ranges to bring out areas of the image. Are you saying there is too little contrast? I am seriously not a portrait or documentary photographer, so I am genuinely asking - When I used BW film I loved grade 4 and 5 filters using multigrade paper for 'punch', but since then I have gained much more appreciation for detail.
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Contrast

Postby zafra52 on Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:21 pm

For my taste, you could do with a little bit more contrast. But, again sometimes you can and others if you do you loose valuable details. Looking at your picture I see too much light on one side of the face and not enough dark shadows on the other. Now, if you can, I suggest you shoot in raw format and you will be amazed how you can change the white balance and the retouching you could do without altering the original. I am not a photographer either and remember taste is purely subjective.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4861
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques