



Comments and Criticims welcome as always.
Roses in a BathtubModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Roses in a BathtubTook these with an off camera SB600 bouncing off the wall and roof, and with my 50mm f/1.8.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Comments and Criticims welcome as always. MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
Both my wife and I like the first one. The blooms take a good proportion of the image. This would be our pick (no pun intended
![]() The second doesn't do a huge amount for me ... I think the scraggy leaves take the focus away from the bloom (although the bloom is nice and sharp). My wife and I are divided on the third. The flower itself looks a bit scrappy, but the background is pretty clean. Your eyes go straight to the bloom. My wife and both like the last one also (although not as much as the first). Good photos overall though. Russell
1 and 4 with out a doubt, the reflection adds so much. 2 and 3 just look like record shots compared to 1 and 4
Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
#1 + #4 for me as well
![]() You may try blowing up the exposure by a little bit on the high key side, with a few spray of water can look cool as suggested by Chris.
![]() did a bit more post processing on my fav. I think i got the effect that i was looking for. MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
When i think roses in a bath i think Mena Suvari . Anyhoo .I digress. I really like the first one ,the reflection looks neat but for me in your reprocess on it you pushed it to far (Only just ) . Just my opinion .
Tony
Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
#1 and #4 for me. I don't mind the blown-out white on the re-PP'd image, but I find the over-contrastiness of it distracting.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
i like the new one. its almost high key now.
Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|