

Weekend weddingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Weekend weddingAnother wedding.....groom was from UK, so he wanted some bridge pics. The reception was at Sebel Pier One.
![]() ![]()
They are both excellent images Vincent. The couple would be very happy with them.
I must say though that I'm not fond of coloured frames as I think they invariably take something away from the photo. But that's just my personal perspective. Your images are great and certainly good enough not to need a coloured frame to enhance them, IMHO. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks guys...
Colour frame.....hmmm I agree, just to put some colours into my blog site. I have a diff colour frame for each wedding ![]()
the 2nd one is nice, has that sense of anticipation to it... the first one, meh... the couple seem to be an afterthought in front... maybe the foreground is too dark?
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|