
3:2
or

Square
Busker on Hindley Street....Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Busker on Hindley Street....Met a friend for tea, were going to watch a movie but missed it haha. Anyhow, took a few snaps through the night but would appreciate C&C on this shot and which one works better.
![]() 3:2 or ![]() Square
Ronza,
for me the first one works better, just get a better feel for the environment. I probably would have like more space on the left in the direction he is looking. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
#2 - the fact that a person is walking by without looking at the busker (who is staring off into the unkown) adds tremendous power to the shot.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I prefer no. 1 as well, good contrast between the distracted busker in dull colour and the bright mural wall behind.
Agree with Phillip though that his suggested #3 would be the best, the second at the moment looks to me almost like 2 separate photos tacked together in the middle. The two subject look like they should have some connection but they don't despite being so close together.
#2 because it's a tighter shot of the subject. I find the mural distracting, either shoot that and minimise the busker more or throw the busker into a dominant position. So 2 works for me.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
same here, great colour though.. is this with your new toy? -julz
Much more atmosphere in #2 in my opinion
![]() Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com "There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
Like both, lean towards #1, empty space with a lot of colour, definitely drawn towards 3:2 image.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
haha maybe then you could just wave a hello at him, smile, or toss some shrapnel.. im sure he's more interested in playing to get money than eying off a photographer! -julz
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|