smokey sunset

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

smokey sunset

Postby NJ on Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:05 pm

the sun was quite amazing tonight because of all the smoke from the bushfires. i found it really hard to get a good exposure, but after some playing in PS i got this which i quite like. let me know what you think. thanks for looking :)

Image
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby mic on Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:43 pm

NJ,

A bit of flaring around Sun and I thinks it would suit it better in Lanscape.

No Frame, maybe just a little.

Otherwise nice colours and attempt.

Cheers,

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby NJ on Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:07 pm

thanks for the advise mic!

it was a hard one to shoot, power poles and lines every where, i cloned out quite alot of them in this one also. is there an easier way of capturing sunsets like this? i found it impossible to get the colour of the sun and foreground in the same exposure.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby seeto.centric on Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:28 pm

when i shoot sunsets with lots of distracting objects around, i usually spot meter and compensate accordingly to allow for reasonable exposure of the more distracting stuff.
but yeah, spot meter works well for me.

i like the shot, sometimes portrait really is the only way to go.. or a crop from landscape.
there appears to be quite a lot of noise towards the lower section where the trees are.

-julz
User avatar
seeto.centric
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills/2153. Sydney

Postby NJ on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:24 pm

thanks for the help

i did use spot meter, but as soon as i copensated dor the foreground the sun blew out and i couldnt capture the colour of it.

yeh the noise is there because i lightened up that area as there was too much black, well thats what i thought anyway.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby surenj on Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:00 pm

you could take 3 or 4 shots and blend them with PS so that the exposure is right for each area
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Postby surenj on Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:16 pm

you could take 3 or 4 shots and blend them with PS so that the exposure is right for each area
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Postby NJ on Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:41 pm

ahh yeh i think might have eough to try that, i havent done it before tho...
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby seeto.centric on Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:25 am

hmm.. would a ND filter help in this situation? or would that still result in underexposed foreground?

-julz
User avatar
seeto.centric
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills/2153. Sydney

Postby NJ on Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:13 pm

dunno, ive never used them, and dont fully understand what the do...
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques