sydney night shots (first attempt)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

sydney night shots (first attempt)

Postby zeddy on Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:45 pm

these are some photos of sydney at night.this is my first attempt at night shots so please be honest with your C&C so it can improve
shot with a canon 30D 18-55mm kit lens.

Image

Image

Image

Image

thanks zsolt :D
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby surenj on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:23 pm

shows how nice the cityscape at night really is....you may want to cut out distractions and focus more on your subject. These often photographed subjects are better received when you find a new angle...if you can...
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Postby drifter on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:29 pm

Hi zeddy . I like the first one .The dark trees on the left are a bit distracting though . The horizon on the opera house needs a tilt .Its leaning to the left a little. Also your sensor needs a clean .Theres quite a few dust bunnies on there.
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby zeddy on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:44 pm

Oh thats what that is dust,the camera is only 3 weeks old how often do you need to clean the sensor? and yes it is leaning to one side i have a really cheap tripod and have troubles getting it straight.
thanks zsolt
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby zeddy on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:48 pm

what about this one is this one better

Image
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby drifter on Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:55 pm

Much better angle .

You only need to clean the sensor if it gets like it is now on yours .Its surprising how quick it gets that way if you change lenses often .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby drifter on Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:12 pm

Actually , check its not just dirt on the end of the lens first .Sounds stupid i know but hey , its easy done i nearly cried when i got home from shooting once and found a horrible smear mark on all my shots .Thinking it was on the sensor and at the time ,not having anything to clean it with i tried blowing the dust out with a dust blower (a proper camera dust blower) no luck , then i realised the damn thing was on the lens filter .
If it's the sensor have a good look around in the forum here for sensor cleaning in the search box .Its one of those things that you'll have to do eventually anyway so best to get a heads up on it so you can get the right gear for it .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby zeddy on Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:12 pm

thanks will have look on the forum

zsolt
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby mattyjacobs on Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:07 pm

the angle of the horizon on all those pics make me dizzy.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby daniel_r on Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:27 pm

The suspicious dots in images #2 and #3 are suggestive of filter flare.

Are you using a UV or skylight filter, particularly an uncoated one?

Typically, filter flare will manifest itself in a particularly identifiable way - the small flare spots appear to take on a mirror reverse of the highlights in the main image. This page shows some examples.

I think I'm seeing a case of this in image #3 where there's a bright headlight trail in at the bottom left of centre, and a reflected reversed version near the top of the tallest building at the top right of centre. The same with the opera house image where the line of lights around the foreshore are shown as a line of flare dots directly above the sails.

You'll achieve much nicer night images by removing any filters and making sure you have clean glass. A good sturdy platform (tripod) and correct focus are also crucial.

Getting the perfect night image is an art... 'It won't happen overnight, but it will happen' :lol: (er... bad pun?)

Another tip is to also consider shooting during "blue hour", the hour after sunset or before sunrise. You'll pickup colour you didn't know existed. I find it just adds a bit more zing to my pics (eg this and this)

keep it up!
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby zeddy on Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:54 pm

thanks for the advice,next time i go,i'll try to go in the "blue hour" and see what difference there is .yes there was a U.V filter on the lens

cheers zsolt
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby ozonejunkie on Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:05 pm

G'day Zeddy - I have used this lens on my 300D (before I upgraded), and found that the combination of 18-55 + Cheap UV filter is no good for night time photos. I think you will find that the image ghosting you are getting is the result of the bright light reflecting of the sensor of the camera, and then being "projected onto" the UV filter, as most cheap filters only have 94% transmissibility.

These days I use multi coated UV filters, and haven't had a problem since.
Admittedly though, I am using a different lens.

Just my $0.02,

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby seeto.centric on Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:28 am

zeddy wrote:Oh thats what that is dust,the camera is only 3 weeks old how often do you need to clean the sensor? and yes it is leaning to one side i have a really cheap tripod and have troubles getting it straight.
thanks zsolt


maybe use self timer mode?
use the spirit level to level it up?

-julz
User avatar
seeto.centric
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills/2153. Sydney

Camera Tilt

Postby jheld on Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:16 pm

I think the water should be level, unless you want artistic perspective.
I like no 3 best.

Re filter:
Why put two more surfaces in your optical path to protect the lens?
User avatar
jheld
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 6:37 am
Location: Kellyville, Sydney

Postby zeddy on Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:51 pm

well i have removed the uv filter.and i did use the auto timer but like i said before the tripod i own is crap and hard to get level i did not have much time to set up better as i was parked in a 15 minute spot.
thanks for your comments,will try again in a few weeks but this time spend more time setting up

zsolt
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques