Making Tracks... On the Beach

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Making Tracks... On the Beach

Postby sheepie on Thu Dec 28, 2006 10:19 pm

Would appreciate comments on my treatment of this scene - does it work for you? What would you do differently?

Image
D200, 10.5 Fisheye @ f9, 1/500th ISO100 - partially defished using DXO

Ta :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby adame on Thu Dec 28, 2006 10:28 pm

Nicely captured scene butfor me the sand is to dark..... And i would try boost the contrast in the sky a little.

Cheers
Adam
Please don't use or edit my images.

D200x2, kit lens, Sigma 105mm f2.8, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, SB600, SB800, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 1.4x TC, 2x TC, Sigma 120-300 f2.8
User avatar
adame
Member
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: Broken Hill, NSW

Postby firsty on Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:17 am

I like the original but not to sure on the horizon smack in the middle
maybe try 1/3 sky and 2/3 sand or the other way around.
and if you go for max sky I think it will make the beach seem real wide and alter the shot a lot (the more I think about it this is the way I would go) it will also need more contrast in the sky to make it pop like Adam said
User avatar
firsty
Senior Member
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:41 am

I agree with Adam & Keith.

In addition, you could also try getting down lower so the tracks in the sand lead into the image from the lower corners, drawing the viewer into the shot and out to the horizon. By getting lower, you'll create a completely different vantage point and should be able to capture some of that detail in the tracks themselves....adding some extra foreground interest to the scene.

To go even further, the spot where the tracks converge could be "off-centre", to break the symmetry of the shot (for something different).

So many possibilities... :lol:

Perhaps next time give them all a go and see what works & what doesn't. I find that by raising or lowering your viewpoint, it usually adds a different dimension and interest to the shot....rather than taking images about 1.5m off the ground (which we're all used to seeing) :wink:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Matt. K on Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:09 pm

Leon
The image suffers from "empty foreground syndrome" There's nothing for the eye to get hold of. You need an extra element, a visual hook, in the foreground. Could be an old boot or a person or anything. Preferably something containing a complimentary colour....bright yellow or green.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby wendellt on Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:33 pm

im just comenting on hte general tone and feel of the image
I like it very much the deep red and polarized blue in the is very appealing tonally, it kind of looks martian
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:26 pm

A further point, Leon, is that the visual energy in this image seems to be the top right hand corner, simply because it is the brightest part of the image. The entire image bleeds out of this corner. Perhaps try brightening the middle of the image and darken down this corner?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques