Or do they both suck ?


Which Crop ?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Which Crop ?Which framing / composition do you prefer in this shot ?
Or do they both suck ? ![]() ![]()
Craig, you asked for which crop, so I'll ignore the difference in colour between them, etc.
![]() IMO it's the difference between intimacy, and isolation. The top shows the two together (nice job on not blowing the whites BTW), whereas the bottom shows more their isolation in sitting at the pier together. The top one gives me the warm and fuzzies - especially fast forward 6 weeks from now, say around Valentines... ![]()
CHi thanks for the honest feedback, I didn't actually look at both together (the WB is very different hmmm will have to look at that). And the D200 gets all the credit for not blowing the highlights, I just snapped opened in CS2 and didn't have any flashing highlights (Impressive).
It is matter of taste actually,
For a romantic feel, #1 for sure As Chi said, #2 makes up an isolation feel of them both at the pier.
Craig,
This simple example goes a very long way towards illustratiing how much just cropping an image can change the way it looks and feels. I prefer the intimacy of the first, but, for the second, try cropping just a little off the bottom, to make the pier a little thinner, and then crop the rh side more tightly, leacing perhaps about the same amount of space between the edge of the frame and the lady's bag as you have between the post and the frame edge on the lh side of the image. Let's see how that crop works, please. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
#2 for me too, Craig.
I feel a sense of romance from this one because it shows two people close together in a fairly isolated setting. #1 on the other hand doesn't actually do much for me at all. Disclaimer - My wife continually tells me that I have no clue when it comes to romance, so consider my comments with caution!
Thanks for the feedback (and I hope I haven't mislead everyone too much) the two images are two different frames taken one after the other but recomposing (Zooming in and out).
Gary here is the crop version (of the second shot), I hope I got it near enough to your suggestions. ![]()
the second "crop" shows more intimacy and story than the first one. for me the second shot shows both isolation and romance which sounds like what you were trying to achieve in the first place
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Craig,
Yes, exactly. The question though is what do YOU think is the best version of these images? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Well I was undecided before but I think #3 tells more of a story then the others, that said I didn't really like the shot to begin with, but it has grown on me (I thought it had potential, but I'm my own worse critic).
![]()
3 for me
![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
For me #1 is still the one - intimacy is about being together and not in isolation with another object. The inclusion of the bollard destroys the intimate feel of the couple IMO
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
And for me #3 works the best... #1 shows little of interest to me as I'd prefer a little more to the story, but #2 lacks balance and framing.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Craig,
There's nothing ever wrong with being your own worst critic. If nothing else, it helps you conserve valuable disk space. ![]() Let's try to play with these images a little more: do you think that perhaps further cropping might help either of these images (1 and 2/3)? If so, where? I do have a couple of thoughts in this realm, so that's why I'm exploring this a little further with you. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|