here is the son of a friend of mine.
D70s + Carl Zeiss 50mm f1.4 Planar T* ZF
Your comments and suggestions are always much appreciated!
Thanks a lot,
theodoros

A B&W boyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A B&W boyHello my friends,
here is the son of a friend of mine. D70s + Carl Zeiss 50mm f1.4 Planar T* ZF Your comments and suggestions are always much appreciated! Thanks a lot, theodoros ![]()
I don't think the composition is all that great.
While I'm not bothered at all by a close crop on the face nor am I bothered that you've done it in landscape format, I think you've killed it by cropping before the end of the lips. You should've given a bit more room at the bottom like you did at the top with the forehead and fringe. Also, as far as a black & white conversion goes, you've lost so much detail in the background blacks... whilst I know your DOF isn't going to hold much there, it still would be nice to have something other than constant black in this image. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Theodoros -
I agree with Leigh, and the conversion is almost too heavy handed. Childrens eyes always sparkle with life (and mischief) and this has been lost in the dull black that has resulted from the conversion. The missing lip really bugs me, but there isn't anything I can do about that, but I did brighten up his face, and his eyes ![]() ![]() If you would like this version removed, I'll do so immediately, but this is an example of what you could do with this shot. I lightened the skin a little, and brought out the highlights and detail in the eye using the dodge tool .... ![]() Hope I haven't offended, and if so, Mods please remove Hugs rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
I prefer the original.
There is a moodiness to the piece that is lost in the revised version. The loss of detail in the background is a small price to pay. I would like to see the lip in though Greg
I agree with the others about the lip.
The extreme black of the background doesn't bother me, but the black eyes do. I like Rel's revision in this case. Not a bad shot, though. Cheers Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
yeah, the lip is a issue for me as well.
but i don't mind the darkness of the whole thing. second shot i think the eyes are just too bright for the whole image. Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Big true about the lips. Too bad that the lips croped in this shot.
Your suggestions about the blacks are very good. It's true that i have lost the detail/highlights in the eyes to achieve the black background. Thank you very much guys for this. Special thanks to blacknstormy for the highlighted eyes version. I personally prefer it. Big thanks for your time and ofcourse there is no problem posting this. Much appreciated guys. Thanks a lot, theodoros
theodoros
This image has enormous power because of its composition. If you can picture a very large print (2 x 3 metres or so) of this image hanging in a gallery it would demand attention! Trust your gut feeling with this image because I think you got it right! Regards
Matt. K
Theo - what Matt said!!
I can certainly see what the other constructive criticism is about, with the lip and all, but as Matt said, imagine this as a massive canvas print! Eerily beautiful. Keep it up!! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Hi Theodoros
I'm no critic, but I'm glad Matt said "trust your gut feeling" because when I saw this, my gut feeling was "wow!" To me, it has a lovely "old time photography" feel and I think it's great! I also would have liked to see the lip, but I really really like this shot anyway, especially after Rel's fixup, probably because I am a BIG fan of the very tight shot, irrespective of anything else, like the shades of black, etc. I'd love to see more tight shots like this - please post some more! Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
To me, saying "the bottom lip is missing" is like saying "the ears are out of focus".
To which I reply "And your point is?" ![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Thank you so much for your kind words and your suggestions.
You push me to try harder! ![]()
Ahh... one of my dreams is to exhibit some of my photos to a gallery... ![]() ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|