Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by poompy on Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:09 pm
Well i have been given a Canon Speedlight 299T to play around with for a little while. I cannot believe the difference between the onboard and this.
Camera Gear:
Canon 350D and kit 18-55
I set the flash to F-Number selection to 5.6 and iso 200
Camera settings were
ISO: 200
F: 5.6
Shutter: 1/60
I bounce the flash to the left and upwards from the cat. The cat was the only available subject. Arent pets great!
Let me know what you think as this is my first shot with another flash so i have a lot to learn.

-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by Yi-P on Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:27 pm
Arent external flashes just great?
Its a must have in every photo bag 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Mr Darcy on Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:53 pm
Once you use external flash for a while you will join the "Popups should be banned" brigade.
Perhaps a white reflector close in (or a second flash!) to add some highlights.
Greg
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by poompy on Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:03 pm
Mr Darcy wrote:Once you use external flash for a while you will join the "Popups should be banned" brigade.
Perhaps a white reflector close in (or a second flash!) to add some highlights.
Greg
seecond flash  ive got a hard enough task infront of me convincing the wife that an external flash is a necessity!!
i will jump on the "Popups should be banned" brigade after doing some more playing around i have found the onboard to be utterly crap!
-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by digitor on Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:20 pm
This is a nice shot! (even though it's of a cat...  ) but anyway, you're lucky having a feline of the 18% reflectance variety!
Sadly, my cat is extremely black, and sort of like a black hole, it absorbs all photons in the immediate vicinity.
This leads to all sorts of exposure troubles.
Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
-

digitor
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia
by Mr Darcy on Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:20 pm
seecond flash  ive got a hard enough task infront of me convincing the wife that an external flash is a necessity!!
Yes Second Flash.
I bought an SB600 with my D70s, and almost immediately realised its limitations. I picked up an SB800 within a couple of months for a good price off eBay. The combination of the two can be magic. Now all I need to do is convince my wife that I need a third  for those highlights
Oh and a cable so I can use the first one off camera, or even better a D200 so I can do it all wirelessly.
Greg
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by stetner on Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:01 am
-

stetner
- Member
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pm
- Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane
by PiroStitch on Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:07 am
having an external flash is one thing...wait till you start using it OFF the camera 
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by gstark on Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:11 am
Mr Darcy wrote:or even better a D200 so I can do it all wirelessly.
You can do that with your D70.
I do, for both the SB800 and/or my studio flash units.
Use the IR/iTTL for the SB800 (can't remember the channel settings) or just dial down the power, kill the preflash, and use the onboard as a trigger for the studio unit.
And, properly controlled, the onboard flash can be very useful: it's great for fill, or to just help balance the lights in some more difficult lighting scenarios.
Poompy,
Does the 350D have FEC? I know it was an omission from the 300D and many users noticed that deficiency, but if you have it available, it's a feature that is well worth exploring.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by poompy on Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:49 am
i will have to see gstark. what will that allow me to do differently?
-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by gstark on Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:14 am
It permits you to dial down the amount of flash power being used to help make your exposure.
I typically shoot with my flash power dialled down to somewhere between -0.7 and -1.3 EV. Great for filling shadows, or to help cope with poor quality or badly coloured light.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by poompy on Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:23 am
confirmed the 350d has FEC will have a play with it tonight.
-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by Mr Darcy on Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:34 am
You can do that with your D70.
Not to the extent I want to.
I know I can fire the SB800 and SB600 remotely, but they have to be set the same. I cannot have the 800 fire at full power & the 600 at 0.25 power.
I don't have studio lights. I wish I did, but I need to be mobile, and the flashes enable that.
Also, the popup contributes SOME light to the final picture no matter what I do. Normally it's trivial, but I am taking photos of highly reflective objects at the moment (Bottles with gilt labels) and I couldn't get rid of a direct reflection until I placed a card in front of the onboard.
Now I am using the 800 onboard to control the 600 remotely. I am bouncing both, and still using a card to block any direct light from the flashes. It is getting better, but I am still not there yet.
I will drop a sample into beginners questions in a few days as I cannot crack the solution, but I am busy with other things at the moment.
Greg
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by gstark on Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:02 am
Greg,
Mr Darcy wrote:You can do that with your D70.
Not to the extent I want to. I know I can fire the SB800 and SB600 remotely, but they have to be set the same. I cannot have the 800 fire at full power & the 600 at 0.25 power.
With careful placement and diffusers, you can do all manner of things. Also, you might like to consider the acquisition of stuff like a pocket wizard or maybe some light triggers for the off-camera units. These will permit you to use them in modes other than iTTL, which affords you a much greater level of control than what you're currently being frustrated by. Do you have a handheld lightmeter/flashmeter? I don't have studio lights. I wish I did, but I need to be mobile, and the flashes enable that.
Using a few simple implements, such as noted above, will permit you to do this. Also, there are some very inexpensive kits available. These provide lightstands, brollies, and small flash heads for a fraction of the price of an SB800. Indeed, the cost of the units I've seen approaches the cost of just a stand + brolly from Vanbar (who are not at all expensive/unreasonable to begin with) and thus you can add quite a bit of versatility to your kit for very few $$$$. Also, the popup contributes SOME light to the final picture no matter what I do. Normally it's trivial,
It should be less than trivial. A couple of months back somebody did some tests of exactly this, and proved that any light added by the popup contributed nothing at all to the exposure/image. If you find that you're seeing the lighting affecting your exposure, then there's a problem in how you're setting the flash. If you're seeing too many reflections in the image, then it may be an issue in your posing/presentation of the subject matter: do you have a light tent, for instance? Now I am using the 800 onboard to control the 600 remotely. I am bouncing both, and still using a card to block any direct light from the flashes. It is getting better, but I am still not there yet.
I think that you should be able to use the 800 to control the 600, and also to have the 600 using different settings from the 800: it needs to be set to be a controller, rather than a slave. I will drop a sample into beginners questions in a few days as I cannot crack the solution, but I am busy with other things at the moment.
As and when you're ready.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Mr Darcy on Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:08 am
This is getting too far off topic.
I will opena new thread to resolve this issue in a few days, when I hopefully have time to follow up on suggestions.
Greg
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|