Im very interested to hear opinions of forum members on what they think. Cheers
Opinions on my exercise in red, yellow and blackModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Opinions on my exercise in red, yellow and blackPlaying with this image tonight and im not sure if I like, loathe or love it.
Im very interested to hear opinions of forum members on what they think. Cheers Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
i think with nature you dont have to improve on it with tricks
the original image would of been much more appealing although i can see the graphic kind of quality you were going for, it has it's purposes
wendellt said
i think with nature you dont have to improve on it with tricks the original image would of been much more appealing i agree with wendellt with this image. cheers pa
Thanks for the feedback guys.
I guess most people wont like this image because it is not "natural" (and looks too different to the way it came out of the camera). When i was playing around with it I was unhappy with the plain image but noticed that the structures in the photograph looked good in association with the three dominant colours. So to salvage something from the image I tried to focus on the colour. My girlfriend loves it (she liked vivid colours) but I am still not sold on it, probably for the same reason that Wendel and Pa have covered off on. Im still interested to hear your opinions (different or same) if you could please comment. Thanks Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
It reminds me of the old CGA 4-colour computer screens. So that's not a good thing.
![]() I would have liked to see it processed (I'd don't know how) to not be as harsh. Allow more of the natural shadows and gradients to appear in the two colours. It looks like at the moment that the two colours are either on or off and there are not any mid-tones. Does that make sense? Do you have the original online somewhere? Daniel Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|