Night Fire Top Fuel Championships

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Night Fire Top Fuel Championships

Postby ozonejunkie on Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:45 pm

Hi All,
Just to add to all the posts featuring drag racing photos, I was at the drags at Willowbank on Saturday evening.

It was really challenging taking photos in the conditions, as most of it was under floodlights after dark and it was my first time at the drags. I know there are some motor sport photographers out there - and I would love some advice on how to better these!

All pics taken with 70-200 f4L, at ISO 3200.

Image

Image

Image


More can be found at: http://photos.ozonejunkie.com/v/msport/dragjan07/.

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby NJ on Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:58 pm

that low noise is incredible! they have less noise at 3200 than my D50 at 1600!
great shots though, those flames really come to life at night.

EDIT: ok maybe the same as mine at 1600 :)
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Kyle on Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:09 pm

What apertures are you running? :)

Go for as low as you can go, up the iso, i see you haev there.. lol
shutter of around 1/150th and pan very very well, should get it looking good.
Also, try software like dxo optics to get the lighting brought up a little, can help :)


Here's one i took a couple of weeks ato @ wsid http://www.ks-photog.net/gallery/d/548- ... 261206.jpg


Basically it comes down to practice, you NEED to pan with the car, otherwise it will never be sharp, simple as that.
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Shoot on Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:20 pm

Im not quite sure how to put into words what im trying to ask, but would it also be better to shoot with say a 100mm lens rather than a 200mm and then crop it to minimise blur?

-Rob.
User avatar
Shoot
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Panania, NSW

Postby Kyle on Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:30 pm

Then I think you would lose too much detail, and the amount of noise evident would kill the detail anyway :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Oscar on Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:21 am

Pretty good first up effort Tristan.

Love the feeling of motion from the blurred background in #1 & #3.
Nice detail in #2.

I haven't tried panning - imagine it would take a little practice to master.

Were you taking multiple shots as you panned??

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby ozonejunkie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:29 am

Thanks for the advice / comments guys!

Kyle wrote:What apertures are you running? :)
.......
Basically it comes down to practice, you NEED to pan with the car, otherwise it will never be sharp, simple as that.


All of these were taken wide open at f4.0.

I was aware that panning was required, but it is easier to say it, then do it. :D
Especially when both cars manage a run over 300mph! :|


Oscar wrote:Were you taking multiple shots as you panned??


I certainly was - I would get about 10-11 shots off per run, then review and delete bad ones between runs.

I was really impressed (to say the least) with the low noise of the 30D, the 300D would've laughed at me to do what I did with the 30D!

Keep the comments coming please!

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby Kyle on Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:25 am

You weren't panning? :o

You were lucky theyre as sharp as they are :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Raskill on Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:43 am

Shoot wrote:Im not quite sure how to put into words what im trying to ask, but would it also be better to shoot with say a 100mm lens rather than a 200mm and then crop it to minimise blur?

-Rob.


You could crop, but like Kyle said, you'll lose detail, unless you already have panning down to a fine art.

If you are shooting at 100mm, you could have your shutter speed almost down to 1/100. Your shutter speed should always be above your focal length. (***always*** depends on what your shooting, but it's a good rule of thumb).

Getting Drag cars off the mark, with tyre deformation and panning is incredibly hard. You'd usually find it easier to get them at full steam and pan with them as the speed is more constant.

If you want to get them off the mark, try a nice short focal length and get as close as possible. Ideally you'd have a constant F/2.8 (or faster) lens, which would let in the light and allow for faster shutter speeds at lower ISO.

Image three is my favourite here, with the ironic logo on the car, followed by number one. I don't mind number two, but it loses a bit (IMHO) by distance from the subject and the people in the way. But, that being said, it's still a good image.

Well done and keep em coming!
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby Kyle on Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:53 am

[quote="Raskill
If you want to get them off the mark, try a nice short focal length and get as close as possible. Ideally you'd have a constant F/2.8 (or faster) lens, which would let in the light and allow for faster shutter speeds at lower ISO./quote]
C'mon man, i've done it with f5.6 :P
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby ozonejunkie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:39 pm

Kyle wrote:You weren't panning? :o

You were lucky theyre as sharp as they are :)


I was attempting to pan, sometimes I did a better job then other times. There is no way (that I could think of) that you could get pics with motion blur, w/o panning. Except maybe Photoshop. :P

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby ozonejunkie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:44 pm

Thanks for your words Raskill, I will try a few of those ideas next time I am at the drags.

These images are all cropped, I think most of them would have originally been around the 70-100mm mark. I was also shooting at either 1/125 or 1/160 shutter speed FWIW.

Thanks all for your advice! Feel free to keep it coming, it is all appreciated!

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques