More IR Park Shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

More IR Park Shots

Postby macka on Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:52 pm

First play with IR. Like Pat I didn't really know where to start when processing these shots, so I'd appreciate you thoughts on the different versions.

I'm going to post 5 images total - a couple of versions of the same two shots for the purpose of seeing which style of processing people prefer (or if they're all crap!), I hope that's OK.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby marcotrov on Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:47 pm

Hi Macka
#3 and #4 are my picks in this IR set. Like the composition ans IR colour shift in #3 and the compositiuon and colour shift in #4 seem to blend well together. The last looks a little too B&W ish. I have tried IR recently but not extensively and need to really work on it to start to get the results you have achieved here. :? Care to explain briefly how you went about it? Seems as though there needs to be quite a bit of trial and error in the process.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby DaveB on Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:37 pm

The discoloured "hot spot" (which is due to the lens causing flare in a specific wavelength band) is quite obvious in the colour photos, and for me is a negative. The position of the colour is fairly fixed in the frame, and trying to superimpose it on an interesting part of the composition can be tricky. The colour shifts in #4 have little to do with IR and the subject: just the position within the frame!

But luckily the flare ends up being just chroma information and not affecting the tone significantly (this is often the case) and thus the camera/lens seem to be producing reasonable monochrome results.

Congratulations: a fine start!

marcotrov wrote:The last looks a little too B&W ish.
How can something be "too B&W ish"? ;)
That one's actually my favourite out of this lot.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby stubbsy on Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:09 pm

Macka

#2 and #3 treatments both appeal to me and #5 is great
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby macka on Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:26 pm

Thanks, guys.

Marcotrov - yes it was a bit of trial and error. I tried to set the white balance to the green grass in camera raw, then for the black and whites just played with channel mixer in monochrome and curves until I got something I was sort of happy with.

For false colour DaveB has a free action on his website (in his sig) which I played around with a bit, plus I tried using Variations, Selective Colour and Channel Mixer in Photoshop as well. I didn't really know what I was doing so it was all just experimentation.

DaveB - yes the Tokina 12-24 definitely has a hot spot - we may just have to try our other lenses for false colour stuff.

Thanks, Stubbsy.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby drifter on Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:33 pm

I like the last one a lot .Really interesting composition and the conversion /IR effect looks great .
Not real keen on the colour effect in #1 ,#3 and #4. Looks like really really old film shots .That may have been the look you were after though .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques