Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Geoff on Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:34 pm
Why? Cos I have got an understanding fiance! She said yes to the 85mm 1.4!!
What's better she even agreed (ok..reluctantly) to pose for some initial shots.
These are the first images from the camera. No PP sharpening, just curves adjustment, crop and resizing.
One happy camper here
Comments welcomed:
Yes...a few short hours after the purchase I still can't get the smile off my face:

-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Oscar on Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:42 pm
Second and third shots are great Geoff.
But you should definately delete that last one
Great addition to the family hey Geoff
Cheers, Mick 
-

Oscar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Panania, Sydney
by Alpha_7 on Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:44 pm
Congratulations Geoff, I hope you've bought Bel a new pair of shoes, or a nice Party dress to say thank you
Awesome photos considering there hasn't been any sharpening in post.
Yikes!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by stetner on Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:28 pm
Looks like a great lens! Oscar wrote:But you should definately delete that last one
Yep, I think that is his 'bad' side! 
-

stetner
- Member
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pm
- Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane
by Onyx on Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:56 pm
The lens is friggin' fantastic - well done, and enjoy your new purchase Geoff.
The colour pics look a bit too subdued. Were these inadvertantly stiil in aRGB colorspace? PS Update your camera's user comment too - it's still got 2006 on it. 
-

Onyx
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: westsyd.nsw.au
-
by Geoff on Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:59 pm
Thanks Onyx - these pics were processed on the lappie.
Colourspace is sRGB
Will fix the date too - ta
Here's another one, B&W:

-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Slider on Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:15 pm
Looks like a great purchase  Lovely bokeh in the 3rd and 4th.
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by Mal on Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:19 pm
You are a lucky man
It is such a beautiful lens.
Mal I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
-

Mal
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Berowra, NSW.
-
by Kyle on Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:20 pm
One of these lenses has my name on it for sure! 
-

Kyle
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Penrith, nsw
by Oscar on Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:23 pm
Love that shot in the new post Geoff. It's a nice shot of Bel and I like the treatment too!
Well done,
Cheers, Mick 
-

Oscar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Panania, Sydney
by Killakoala on Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:51 pm
You will love it Geoff.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by colin_12 on Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:04 pm
your a lucy lad Geoff.
#2 for me.
REgards Colin
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by stubbsy on Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:19 pm
OK Geoff I'm being quite tough on you here.
#1 is not at all flattering because of the forced distortion of the pose and the OOF right eye doesn't help.
#2 is better, but Bel looks a little awkardly posed. It doesn't look relaxed or natural somehow
#3 has a much better candid and relaxed feel to it, but the OOF right eye still lets you down a little
#4 is a good image - shows the lens off well and has great bokeh - you look overjoyed and it's a great natural image
I was about to say that the lens is obviously no good, but then I saw the one you subsequently posted of Bel. That image has ALL the qualities that the others lacked. The pose is wonderful, the image is so sharp my eyeballs are bleeding and the really piercing eyes just compel you to look at the image. Excellent.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Geoff on Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Peter - thanks for your honest critique.
I appreciate the brutatlity
I obviously have a bit to learn with this new lens - bear in mind that these were the very first images taken with the camera when it was only about 20 minutes 'young' 
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Reschsmooth on Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Geoff, I was going to say exactly what Peter said
Seriously, to sound repetitive, the last one you posted really shows up why the lens (which I don't have) is a great portrait lens. The last photo is one of those ones where even the subject (if, like me, doesn't like being photographed) would be happy to see.
P
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by gooseberry on Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:43 am
Congrats on the lens Geoff, I'm sure you will enjoy it very much - look forward to seeing more great images from you.
-

gooseberry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
- Location: Singapore
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|