Please critique. This was my first time with a black backdrop, and colored light. Also first time I have shot the backlight towards the model, rather than on the backdrop.
appreciation feedback, thanks
Oz
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
model headshot with gelsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
model headshot with gels
More experimentation with coloured light.
Please critique. This was my first time with a black backdrop, and colored light. Also first time I have shot the backlight towards the model, rather than on the backdrop. appreciation feedback, thanks Oz
Focus seems to have missed the front eye and hit the hair instead.
The colour is interesting but I'm not sure what you were going for. The angle/colour/strength of the light would be great for a sunset photo. Black backdrop doesn't seem to fit. What other angles / strength did you try with the light?
Hi Bruce,
I agree regarding the focus issue. It does look soft to me. What settings were you on in terms of shutter speed/aperture. Also, I think black background does not suit yellow colour of the gel you used for backlighting. The gel colour suits and accentuates her hair colour, but not the background. Alex
Thanks for the feedback. The softening was a little photoshop dabbling, using blur to soften the face. Black backdrop was new, so I was experimenting to see what would work with it, so all part of my learning. I now wish I had been more creative during the shoot, and moved the light around much more... oh wel...
This was f11 @ 1/125th, ISO 200. Thanks for feedback on the gel color. I was trying a few different ones, I'll post a few examples. I like the black for its purity, and isolation. here is one against the studio wall (light grey) 
Hi Bruce,
I think the 2nd one with yellow background, or white background turned yellow is an imporvement. The other issue is still the focus. I think you mis-focused and focus went some other place than the face. Your settings seem fine and it should be very nice and sharp at the settings you state, I think it is simply an issue of trying to focus on the eyes of a model. Cheers Alex
I like the way the second shot came out. A great tip I recieved was to keep the focus on the closest eye to the lens.
Edit: It seems your lens is male as well, both shots are focused on her bust! haha
Yes, I agree, and thought the same when I was looking through these. I'll have to make some improvement in my focus technique.
For this for of shot, I use the default centred area, using AF-Lock, and recompose. Something is not right...
Bruce,
When you say you use the AF button, is your focus mode AF-C or AF-S. If it's the former then you need to focus it on her eyes the let it go (the button) and recompose then shoot (don't press the AF button again). If it's in AF-S, however, then you need to press this botton whilst focusing on her eyes, HOLD it, then recompose while holding (don't let it go), then shoot. It's the opposite technique and can be quite confusing but it works! Alex
thanks Alex, I'll grab my camera and check now. bugger.
Alex, I was using AF-C, which does not require holding the AF-ON button (as AF-S does).
Therefore, think I am either moving zoom ring due to support hand position, or maybe as wendellt raised in another thread, a "backfocus" problem? I'm sure there is a test I can do to check that???
backlight is cool
but i think it works best when in it's used in theme like disco theme coloured backlights or somne sort of funky retro theme but in this example the light looks to artificial maybe if it were less yellow and more complimentary to the main tone of the image that would be much better also watch things like the light spilling out too much cos the bit under her arm looks odd, backlights are usually to emphasise hair, you could snoot the backlight so it only gets the hair or if u want to emphasise the body more put a beauty dish on that backlight it would cover more area and difusse the light somewhat good work for a first try as for your focus problem even if its a backfocus issue your shooting at f11 so the depth of field would cancel out that issue it woudl be helpful to know what range your shooting at distance from model and you and the lens used backfoicus issues are really noticable at 200mm when shooting distand stationary objects more than 10 meters awayif the area you focus locked on is blurry in the resulting image it's a backfocus issue at close range the backfocus issue is more subtle
the headshot, was at 200mm, about 7 meters distance to subject. f11, 1/125th, which may be camera shake? here is a 100% crop of the unedited version. 
Being in focus isn't enough.
Try manually focusing with your camera set to burst. That way you can fire off a few frames whilst modifying the focus ever so slightly. Within the focal plane there are is an area where everything appears the sharpest, finding that place is the fun part!
True, is this handheld? Try using mirror lockup mode, even if it's on a tripod.
yes, handheld. not yet comfortable with tripod in the studio, but I'm thinking for a set shot, seated like this, it would be worthwhile, and increase to 1/250th.
Not when he's using flash. The only thing that's happenning at the 1/125 is that the shutter is fully open. Within that blink of an eye, the flash will also be triggered, for maybe a poofteenth of a second, and that's when the exposure is made. Camera shake is not an issue. In that crop, I'm actually seeing what might be an acceptable level of in-camera sharpness, but it leads me to enquire after the in-camera and post-processing settings. Basically, I want to know what level of sharpening has been applied here; I suspect that a little bit of unsharp mask might be the answer to this problem, and maybe even add a smidgeon of in-camera sharpening to nail this. Also, what lens was used? My guess is that this is your new toy, Bruce, in which case I'm going to suggest oopening it up a tad; f/11 is, in my experience, beyond the sweet spot. Try f/8 or f/9, and see where that leaves you. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
thanks Gary. new toy is too long (thats for the ski race this weekend). the first image in this thread (headshot) was with 70-200 VR. The second was with 28-70. No sharpening used (in camera nor PP). I had, in the first image, used the blur tool over the cheeks and forehead, including nose and mouth). Eyes were left alone. But the shots in my other posts (tonights) are out of focus with no PP. Are you suggesting that I should make use of "sharpening"? Still feels like I am not getting it in focus in the camera...
here is the first image, unedited.
Perhaps the focus issue was due to the softening in PP? 
Ok ... f/6.3 - f/9-ish ... and try a couple of the moderate levels of sharpening.
See my other comments about holding focus after acquisition. My experience is that it's usually an issue of technique, and I know you won't be offended by that. Or at least I hope you won't be ... 
But I think that you'll want to use the lens' sweet spots, a smidgeon of in-cam sharpening (if you've shot in raw, drag the NEF into NCE and adjust the sharpening there to see what it might look like) and look at how you're actually acquiring focus. In NCE there's a setting that will show you the focus point that was used for the image: have a look at those and see see if they're any different from where you thought the image was focused. Then, zoom in and pixel peep (100%) at the point of focus, and see how sharp that part of the image is. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Colour and sharpness can be fixed in post.
Sharpness: Use unsharp mask. Colour: 1. Adjust Levels to get a true blacks and whites and a nice gamma. Next problem is the harsh backlight. The yellow is overwhelming the subject. This is where a little colour theory comes into play. Apply a yellow filter to bring the colour temperature of the mainlight inline with the direct yellow light. Once that is done you have an image with a more consistant light temperature. Very warm, but consistant. Now what we want to do is cool down the lighting. So a blue filter is applied and adjusted. And that's it! Here is a copy of the psd with the above corrections. Play around with the layers turning their visibility on and off to see what they do. http://saggi.com.au/Pic/20070205_gel_corrected.psd When working in raw you can push the image much futher! Greg
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
