Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by ozonejunkie on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:08 pm
Apologies to anybody hoping for a reference to Joe Cocker (edit: or Ray Charles  ) ....
Some friends of ours have just had some new arrivals on their land, some baby Clydesdales. I decided to go over and take some photos before coming back to uni. The one pictured is about 4 months old.
I would have loved this photo without the fence, but it didn't present itself, thus I decided to try and create a more dark feeling in the image.
Comments, Critiques, Criticism all welcome!
Cheers,
Tristan
Last edited by ozonejunkie on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

ozonejunkie
- Member
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D
-
by Alpha_7 on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:19 pm
Very cute, its one of those... Awwwww photos  Was it shot this tight ? Or do you have a wider crop ?
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by gstark on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:20 pm
Tristan,
ozonejunkie wrote:Apologies to anybody hoping for a reference to Joe Cocker....
Joe Cocker ???
Ray Charles, please!
Oh yes ...
Great fun image, but why does the lh side look to be softer in its contrast range than the rh side?
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by ozonejunkie on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:36 pm
Alpha_7 wrote:Was it shot this tight ? Or do you have a wider crop ?
Unfortunately, I don't have a wider crop. This was shot @ 70mm using the 70-200 f4 lens. The moment presented itself, and i didn't have time to move back.
Gary - Apologies for not recognizing the original - thanks for picking that one up - I know for next time now.
The only reason that I can think for the contrast variance is the vignette that I added. It is much more noticeable on the RHS as the original colours were more contrasty. Would this make sense?
Tristan
-

ozonejunkie
- Member
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D
-
by gstark on Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:48 pm
Tristan,
No worries on the Ray vs Joe stuff; they're both very good versions.
On the vignetting ... perhaps. Could you please post the original, and also tell us how you handled the conversion.
Thanx.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by ozonejunkie on Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:55 pm
Gary,
This is a colour version of the image:
The PS process is really nothing fancy - I just used the quick n easy saturation reduction, and added a vignette using Photoshop's Lens Correction features.
Tristan
-

ozonejunkie
- Member
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D
-
by hangdog on Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:02 pm
The one on the right doesn't look like a cocker to me, but I reckon the one on the left would have a horse voice.
--Chuan
-

hangdog
- Member
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:59 pm
- Location: Knoxfield, Melbourne
-
by Ladybird on Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:30 pm
Very cute. I like the B&W conversion on this - I think it has really improved the shot. I don't mind the fence being present in it either. I think it gives the 'different side of the tracks' feel.
-

Ladybird
- Member
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:01 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|