
Paul and RachaelModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Paul and RachaelSame lighting setup as was used with Craig and Katie. Experimenting with the umbrella and SB800's was a lot of fun. Comments and critiqued welcomed. I know under Paul's right eye is slightly blown:
![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
They look very happy and relaxed so you obviously are able to communicate with your clients well....and thats half the battle I feel...its another natural portrait that I am sure that they will love...
![]() It is a bit blown on Pauls face..but I don't mind it too much.... The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
Nice portrait Geoff, well composed and framed. I do find the image too soft though and my eyes cannot see any point of sharpness. In particular, Paul appears to be really out of focus. What aperture were you on? Also, whilst B&W works I would like to see more contrast (tonal range) in the photo.
Alex
Thanks for the comments guys. Alex, see what u mean indeed. Whilst Paul isn't completely OOF he's not as in focus as Rachael is, and that's what you'd expect with F2.8. We were more concerned at this stage of getting the lighting right and if I had the time over again, I'd bump to an F6 or so to get a more even focus distribution. Again, thanks
![]() Last edited by Geoff on Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Sorry Geoff. I didn't mean out of focus for Paul... just my weired way of speaking. I mean a bit soft. I think lighting is close to perfect, the DOF is easily fixed by smaller aperture. Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|