Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by mrbillf on Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Hi All,
I photographed a wedding a couple of weeks ago and I'm at a point of going through all the photos I took but, I can't seem to really crack this shot. It's one of those 'bride look in the mirror' shots and at the moment I need some help in regards to what looks best.
Here is the photo. The lighting in this room was a warm golden colour all over and as expected with the type of wall paper and coloured furniture etc and the photo came out looking very golden. So I decided to play with the RGB colours and this is what I came up with. Does it work for you? or can you suggest what I should do with it?
Before
After
Thanks again
Bill
-

mrbillf
- Member
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW -- D3, D200, D1H & D70 --
by barry on Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:06 pm
Whats wrong with the original shot. While it may not be a true reflection of the room colours it has a wamer feel about it that looks better to me.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
-

barry
- Member
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
- Location: Emu Plains NSW
by sirhc55 on Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:19 pm
I agree with Barry - the original looks so much better than the PP’d version 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Alex on Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:49 pm
The original looks great. The 2nd one has WB too cool.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by vikin70 on Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:54 pm
warm tones work better. both look underexposed to me. i would crop to portrait to get rid of the wall ornament details, i find them distracting. then again i find the whole composition distracting, but thats just me. the % of her face/body ratio to the entire picture is too small.
-

vikin70
- Member
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: Cannington, Perth [d300 woopwoop]
by johnd on Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:06 pm
I too like the first warm shot more than the colder bluer second image.
I also agree about cropping to make the bride a larger part of the image. Maybe crop just to right of lamp and take a little off the mirror frame on the left. Crop off the top third of the shot and part of the bottom of the frame so the shot stays as a landscape orientation but with the bride a bigger part of it.
The window blind and house outside the window is unfortunate. You could replace these but that's a bigger job and the bride might want the actual thing, not some artistic photoshopping.
Cheers
John
-

johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by mrbillf on Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:40 pm
Ok. Thanks again guys, you've been most helpful.
I've digested all you valuable comments and gone with John's recommendations. Does this look better?
Mind you this was taken at the reception place in Dural called Springfield. It's one of those country style ranch places and the day was very poor for lighting as it was raining rather heavy for most of the day.
Regards
Bill
-

mrbillf
- Member
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW -- D3, D200, D1H & D70 --
by johnd on Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:01 pm
I like this heaps better. You can see more detail in the brides face and in the flowers. I must admit I didn't even notice the flowers in the first image.
Cheers
John
-

johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by ATJ on Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:08 pm
I think the happy couple would be very pleased with the 3rd version.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by Yi-P on Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:23 pm
Yes, the last version is best of them all 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by DebT on Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:07 am
Hi,
yes I like the bride, the details of the flowers, the crop and the warm tones but I think it would be worth the effort of removing the white object in the lower left corner (replace with blind details) - its simply ugly, distracting and does not belong.
Hope you included the lovely antique picture in another shot - it adds to the romantic feel and adds family history.
Deb T 
-

DebT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
by PiroStitch on Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:01 am
It's a major improvement from the first photo. You can concentrate more now on the bride and there are less things to distract you.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|