Panoramas from Harbour Walk

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Panoramas from Harbour Walk

Postby Yi-P on Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:52 pm

I'm here again with the panoramas... 8)
I tweaked my 4MP into a 12MP camera... cool! :lol:

3 of them here, not sure which one works better....

Image


Image


Image


C&C appreciated 8)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Geoff on Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:54 pm

I like 2nd and 3rd here Yip, the third one shows more interest with the ppl in it. The 2nd I like the wall component in the bottom right hand corner. Great reminder of a magic morning! Well done bud.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby tsanglabs on Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:59 pm

Nice panos!

For me it is a split between the 1st & 3rd for fav. I like the 3rd but the horizon looks a bit crooked to me. I like the inclusion of the photogs.

I like the way the 1st pano starts off from the bottom right and leads the viewer across the bay to the bridge, with the cityscape centered between the two.

For the 2nd I personally find the track on the bottom right too distracting.

my 2c :roll:
User avatar
tsanglabs
Member
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 9:50 pm
Location: Melb, Vic

Postby Yi-P on Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:20 am

Thanks :)

It sure was a magical morning with plenty of exercises!! :D
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:27 pm

Nicely capture Yip, I take it you used Panofactory to stitch these ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Matt. K on Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:21 pm

Hi Yi-P
As an example of producing pano shots....excellent! But as images to look at again and again they are missing something. This is only my opinion and others will probably disagree....but for me, too many pictorial elements but no main element....compositon seems to be lacking and the eye gets 'walked' out of the image frame. Distracting or empty foregrounds. Images look cold and overly blue.
So I'm guessing this is not how it seemed when you were looking through the viewfinder but that's how perception and photography often clash. Looking at the scene and wondering how it might have been improved I guess a much longer focal length lens and just concentrate on the city....leaving a little water in the foreground. I think that would have worked. When creating panos you need to put the technique behind the subject selection and that can be a bloody hard thing to do. One aproach is to look at a subject that you would photograph normally because of its appeal....and make a pano out of it.
I hope this makes sense as a constructive critique.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Geoff on Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:57 pm

Matt - your critques are always that, constructive. It's great having you here :wink: Happy bday too.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Yi-P on Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:34 pm

Matt. K wrote:Hi Yi-P
As an example of producing pano shots....excellent! But as images to look at again and again they are missing something. This is only my opinion and others will probably disagree....but for me, too many pictorial elements but no main element....compositon seems to be lacking and the eye gets 'walked' out of the image frame. Distracting or empty foregrounds. Images look cold and overly blue.
So I'm guessing this is not how it seemed when you were looking through the viewfinder but that's how perception and photography often clash. Looking at the scene and wondering how it might have been improved I guess a much longer focal length lens and just concentrate on the city....leaving a little water in the foreground. I think that would have worked. When creating panos you need to put the technique behind the subject selection and that can be a bloody hard thing to do. One aproach is to look at a subject that you would photograph normally because of its appeal....and make a pano out of it.
I hope this makes sense as a constructive critique.


That is a bloody good suggestion!! :shock:

It was quite tiring and exhausted by time we got 'up' there... I was thinking of pulling out my 300mm, but then it takes a little effort to hold it there, so I stood with the 35mm. I guess laziness and photography don't mix :oops:


A pano out of subjects I normally photograph, ahh, that sounds hard but really interesting. Places I photograph often is tight spaces and will be interesting of a panorama out of tight space!! :idea:
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques