500mm Mirror lens hand held, 90th f8 Nikon D2Xs..... yes I was leaning on the rail

Arrived for lunch......Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Arrived for lunch......these birds arrive anytime during the day to feed on the native shubs in my garden...... easy shots from the balcony..... full frame image
500mm Mirror lens hand held, 90th f8 Nikon D2Xs..... yes I was leaning on the rail ![]() Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
this forum is tough........34 lookers and not a word........ makes you not want to post pixs anymore.......
this image is not really that bad for a quick grab shot, I have seen a lot worse on this forum in times gone by and a lot said........ and yes I have taken better bird pixs than this one but as bird photographers will know, these creatures are very flighty and hard to get a pix of in the wild..... please comment on images you look at, good or bad, or just say you don't like the shot...... there are a lot of good pixs that go by and not a word is said about them, must make the photographer feel good about his or her work We could all help the new togs with simple comments, only with taking lots of pixs, help from other members with comments, and trying a lot do new photographers improve. I have seen a lot of members work improve over the last few years, so let give the others a helping hand with the odd comment END OF MY RANT....... I will go back to my corner Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Interesting comment Bernie. Have you read THIS post? As for this image. It's SUnday and many people are busy - at weekends. 34 views and no comments means bugger all IMHO. 340 and no comment would be different ![]() As for the image. It comes across very much as you describe it "a quick grab shot" and this would be one I'd normally refrain from commenting on since I know you've been around long enough to know what's wrong with the shot. Since I'm commenting though I'd say the foreground twig is distracting and it's a little clutterd. Nothing terrible about the shot, but not a standout. If it was one of my images I'd be happy to have got it, but I probably wouldn't be posting it for critique. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I, too, don't think it has the best composition, but a couple of positives:
- the colour of the bird is excellent - no donuts from the mirror lens! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Lovely shot of a bird.
Nothing excellent about it, but nothing awful either. I viewed it and thought 'nice'. Cos I didn't comment doesn't mean a thing. Quality rather than quantity. Stubbsy's comments are wise. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Well Big Pix, I must admit I've probably been responsible for about 4 of the views, I'm currently surfing on two PCs, and had been logged out on each so was just viewing what was new, and not commenting.. I usually do that in bulk when I'm not distracted by other things (like watching movies/tv at the same time.
Given the lens used, I think the image quality is impressive and there is no sign of the doughnut bokeh, that said the second biggest problem I have with this shot is the background, or lack there of.. it's just bland, grey and boring.. the first problem is obviously the twigs in the forground.. but you can't position a wild bird so you get what you can. The shot is sharp and the colours vibrant but the background is actually the more I look the bigger problem of the two.. as the twigs make it seem more like a wild shot rather then a tame lorikeet.
These birds are so hard to get a decent shot of i know because i have been trying recently of a tree in front of my place that these birds have started to frequent and so far nothing great. So congrats on getting such a sharp image but obviously the twigs in front of the bird are distracting but still a great shot.
thanks all........ Craig the grey is the road down the side of my house as I live on a hill and I am on the corner. The garden has lots of natives, and as the birds are now starting to get use to having a camera poked at them they are starting to forget I am around....... thats Around not round.....
you only get donuts with the 500 mirror lens if there are lots of highlights in the image background...... overcast day, I was lucky Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Bernie
That image has a beautiful quality about it and you deserve praise for having crafted it. Now...about that 1/4 plate you have...how the hell do you eat off it? ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards
Matt. K
edit: Big Pix has messaged me saying that I'm not qualified to comment on his images. So I withdraw my critique.
Last edited by moz on Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
If an image is posted in "Image Reviews and Critiques", then any member may comment on it. Just as we may sometimes not like the photographs posted by others, we may sometimes also disagree with a critique of our own photo. But AFAIK, freedom of expression is alive and well on this forum. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Nice shot of the bird... but kind of an average photo, Bernie.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
To me it looks like a photo of a stick with a bird in the background..... but what would I know.... so I won't comment on the image...... Cheers..... What's another word for "thesaurus"?
Out of interest or boredom, I ran some quick stats on the last 50 or so Image R&C posts and: The average number of replies as a percentage of watches is 5.01% The minimum number of replies as a percentage is 0.0% The maximum number as a percentage is 11.76%. Before this post, your percentage of 6.52% was above average ![]() Whilst not included in the sample, I have had a recent thread which would be included in the above minimum! I guess my conclusion is that many people will walk past and have a look, but you can't expect everyone to stop and say something! ![]() P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Personally I like the photo, It's bright and colourful, and is very natural looking, it has a candid quality about it. The clutter of branches around the animal in no way detracts from it as this adds to the feeling of the bird being in its element
Being an owner of an F8 500mm mirror lens, i can appreciate how hard it is to get a photo of this quality using that lens.
Well done. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|