

Which works ? If Either ??Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Which works ? If Either ??Not sure if either of these work so I'm throwing it out there, do you like either of them, if so which ?
![]() ![]()
I'd say the first one.
The colour is easier to look at as your eye doesn't get lost in the blur of white. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Works? depends what YOU took it for?
As a viewer, the first. I like the color. I like the smooth transition of blur as each row of chairs goes on.
I think the colour version has more betterness to it - the B&W version just doesn't seem to have any punch to it.
P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
The colour version is much easier on the eyes to work out what the scene is. There's too much white in the conversion.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
2nd one if contrast is very strong to get the differences between the chairs, otherwise, I choose first one.
Thanks for all the feedback, I actually prefered the B&W because I didn't like the tones in the colour version I thought they were sickly.. that said as the photographer, I knew they were chairs.. and if you view from top to bottom (as most do.. especially on the net) then I can see why the B&W is harder "to get".
I just tried a different version for you yip is this any closer ? ![]()
Hi Craig,
I still think you have better separation in the colour one, and I actually like the tones, it looks like a bit of golden sunlight is hitting the scene. ![]() I think the white actually blurs together even more in your 2nd b&w, mainly because the whites have been pushed further. This is not necessarily a bad thing, just a matter of taste. Overall, nice shot. Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Colour for me too Craig. In fact IMHO if you take a little crop off the top, removing the dead space, there isn't that distraction of that shadow and the last row of chairs thus remving the specular highlights there. It tightightens the image I feel. See what you think. It looks more pleasing to me anyway
![]() cheers marco
THanks for the suggestions guys, I've reworked it as you've described (I hope). Here it is. ![]()
The first one!I believe the first one is the best of the two, but perhaps if it had more depth of field it would be easier for the eye. It is a good exercise on pattern though.
The only thing missing is a coat hanging over the back of the nearest chair. I still think it's a very creative image....but it required an extra prop to make it a winner. Sometimes we just have to cheat a little.
![]() Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|