Do you dig the selective colour like me or is it not your cup of tea?
Warm BuddhasModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			9 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
Warm BuddhasFrom my Japanese trip last year
 
                  
            Do you dig the selective colour like me or is it not your cup of tea? Steve (Nikon D200/D700) 
		My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works 
 I think the coloured one Steve, the colours in the background are muted enough for me that the red stands out already. 
                  
            
		
 Since you ask, it isn't my cup of tea, but selective colour with monochrome seldom is - are the reds that colour naturally or did you paint them in PS? 
 
                  
            I do appreciate that the Buddhas may have been lost in the background otherwise. P Regards, Patrick
 
		Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug 
 About a 10point sat boost on the reds, i will look into toning them down.
 
                  
            Cheers for letting me know though. Whilst no-one likes hearing that their work is no pleasing, I appreciate this kind of comment (learning experience). Steve (Nikon D200/D700) 
		My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works 
 
 Whilst I am sure you do, bear in mind that it is not so much a comment on your photo or technique, but more my preference. P Regards, Patrick
 
		Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug 
 
 I think your work is pleasing, it was just a matter of the colour being more pleasing than the selective colour 
 cheers 
                  
            Steve (Nikon D200/D700) 
		My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works 
 I would say the colour version simply because the other version looks a tad fake - the red is too dominant, if toned back the second shot could work better  
                  
            Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			9 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |