An exercise in PP

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

An exercise in PP

Postby spaz on Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:51 pm

I've decided to make two attempts at post processing this image with very different results. I think each has it's own merit but am not really sure which I prefer, is the second one "too much"?

Image

Image
http://www.50mmprime.com

D70s | 50 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 18-70 | 70-300 ED | Pinhole | SB800

POTW 24.04.07 - thanks Geoff
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:06 pm

I like the second more. Even with the harsher contrast and overly sharpened background it really works for me. You end up with a pool of light in front of the busker that is beckoning the couple walking.
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby daniel_r on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:19 pm

#2, and I agree with Brett's comments. The processing just finishes it off nicely, and takes it up a notch.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby olrac on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:58 pm

#2 for me
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby iGBH on Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:36 pm

#2 for me also. The pool of light in front of the busker draws the focus more to him and gives the image a different dimension which seems to be missing in the first.
User avatar
iGBH
Member
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: Eltham, Melbourne

Postby methd on Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:27 pm

i'll go with the crowd and choose #2, too.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby NJ on Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:38 pm

definately the second for me also, make for a much more powerful image, draws all the attention to the busker (if that is what he is)
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby binky on Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:50 pm

2nd one for me too. In the first, my eye seems to be drawn to the yellow of the car number plate and the green bollard.
binky
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: Strathfield, Sydney

Postby spaz on Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:54 am

The more I look at them the more I lean towards the 2nd as well so have updated it in the blog.

Thanks everyone.
http://www.50mmprime.com

D70s | 50 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 18-70 | 70-300 ED | Pinhole | SB800

POTW 24.04.07 - thanks Geoff
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney

Postby dodge on Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:15 am

agree with everyone else here..No.2 :D
dodge
Member
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: Calamvale Brisbane Qld

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:27 am

No 2 for me as well. Can you explain your PP process on this one please?

Cheers

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby spaz on Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:32 am

The original:

- A very slight S curve to enhance the contrast
- Duplicate the main layer twice (one color burn one color dodge) and selectively apply with a layer mask

New one (using the original as a base):

- Duplicate original and set as linear light, revealing everywhere but the man by layer mask
- Increased level of color burn over car and feet and added a circle to the layer mask for vignetting
- -59 saturation across everything but the man
- Another S curve
- And another S curve but only applied to the man
- -17 saturation across the whole image
- Selective color: reds (+17% black) yellows (-22% black) blues (-35% black)

All selective applications were done with a large paintbrush at 3-10% opacity and then the layer mask had a Gaussian blur of about 65 applied just to even it out.
http://www.50mmprime.com

D70s | 50 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 18-70 | 70-300 ED | Pinhole | SB800

POTW 24.04.07 - thanks Geoff
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques