Here are my feeble attempts using a maiden hair firm, 85mm lens and 1x & 2x macro filters.
C&C appreciated.




All hand held, ambient light, 1/60th - 1/100th, f1.6 - 3.5
Fern macros (kind of)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Fern macros (kind of)I saw some monochrome photos of branch and leave sillhouettes (sp) in a magazine that I thought I would like to copy.
Here are my feeble attempts using a maiden hair firm, 85mm lens and 1x & 2x macro filters. C&C appreciated. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() All hand held, ambient light, 1/60th - 1/100th, f1.6 - 3.5 Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
I like the idea, and the choice of background is good. I think though that some more DOF would make these better. More of the plant being a crisp outline will have more impact, and make it a stronger image. Of course that's potentially a tough thing to do if they're blowing around in the wind!!
Thanks for the feedback.
The background was the splash back behind the stove top, light by the exhaust fan light. I dialled the WB to a nice warm colour. There was no wind as it was indoors. I should have gone for a smaller aperture, but hand held, I would have had to drag the shutter speed down too far (I couldn't be bothered getting the tripod). The macro filters have a significantly shallow DOF regardless of aperture used anyway. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Ah, it has a look of a being shot into sunset which I liked. Perhaps if you could light the background more strongly to get the aperture smaller, you could use a desk lamp or even a strobe and then just use WB to get the colour, and focus the light somehow to get the fall off you want.
I do think with a little tweaking you could get some great shots, and it lends itself to other silhouettes as well.
I agree with the discussion points above
![]() I reckon the first is the strongest image... I'm not sure, but I think I prefer the 'stronger' (not necessarily sharper - but merely not as 'transparent') silhouettes. Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|