The emphasis this time was to show youth, freedom and being carefree (if that makes sense?).
Enjoy!



Portrait of a friendModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Portrait of a friendWell on Sunday went to a friends place to fine tune my portraiture skills. Got my friends involve and turned out to be an awesome day. Good people, good location and good weather.
The emphasis this time was to show youth, freedom and being carefree (if that makes sense?). Enjoy! ![]() ![]() ![]()
Ron,
I know why you've kept the chain and post on the rh side in the first image, and it looks great, but I think it actually adds nothing to the image as a portrait. Crop them out, and just keep the lady; tell me what you think. Second one is marred by the individual bits of hair across her face. And you've absolutely nailed the light and exposure in these .... g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
You have generally done a great job in my opinion. My only quibble, and I am not sure if it really bothers me, is the comp in the first one. My general view is that the subject should look into the frame, not out of it. However, I think this is a case where the rule is well broken.
![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Thank you everyone for your valuable opinion. I'll take these onboard
Gary: In the first picture the reason why I added chain and poles in the composition was to also show more of the environment without it being 'too wide' and making it too busy. However having said that, I'll take your advice and play around with some cropping and see what I can come up with. After taking a look at the second picture, yes I have to agree the individual strands have marred the shot. Looks like healing brush to the rescue.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|