
1

2

3

4
Not sure if the last one works yet, seems to be a bit too dark in the shadow areas..
Tassie photos part 2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tassie photos part 2cont. from part 1
![]() 1 ![]() 2 ![]() 3 ![]() 4 Not sure if the last one works yet, seems to be a bit too dark in the shadow areas.. http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
you know what, i never even saw the irony until you mentioned it...
http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
Great comp/tones/irony in #2,
Love the colour/perspective in #3, And a great sky in #4. Not much you can do about the shadows unless you bracket I guess, or use filters. but I don't mind it. Cheers.. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
I also like number 2 the best though I do like no 3. The more I look at No 2 the more I want to get rid of that horizontal post (looks like a goal post) on the left of the fence. Once I start looking at it it distracts me. Mind you there is probably a hefty fine involved if you do get rid of it.
![]() Well done Nikon & Olympus
They're a very nice set of shots. I too am drawn to number 2, even if only because it is quirky and particularly dramatically presented. But I like the effect of the first and the texture of the third and the nice muted colours of the fourth as well. Nice stuff!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
Great set but I agree that #2 really works well. The srtong sense of line epitomised by the arrow at the diagonal and the B&W treatment really enhances the shot together with its grouping with the other colourful shots tends to empasise the contrast between them.
cheers marco
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|