Macaw - C&C Please To crop or not to cropModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Macaw - C&C Please To crop or not to cropHi,
took this Macaw in flight shot (Adelaide zoo) and am determined to keep practicing but would appreciate C&C on what I could do better (and how to achieve this)? Also interested on C&C re cropping (at ths stage I'm just happy getting the whole bird inframe, mostly in focus and no people in background) but how best to present finished product ? <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12727308@N05/1338250790/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1014/1338250790_14adddb3f6.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="macaw2 IMG_5731" /></a> It's also the first time I have posted a photo and tried to follow guidelines but PLEASE let me know if there is anything I should be doing different Rgds Deb T Shot with Cannon 400D & 70-300 IS USM
Deb that is a wonderful shot. To my mind a tighter crop would improve the image because the background adds nothing to the overall effect.
![]() "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
if it was mine i'ld crop some off the bottom and right hand side...... apart from that it looks like a very good first image post.
cheers pa
crop a little off the bottom and from behind the bird so it is flying into the picture will add more impack....... nice image
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Yep I'm with all those above me on the cropping issue... it would also serve to remove some of the more 'in focus' palm fronds that are dsitracting from the subject...
Its a gorgeous shot btw... just enough sharpeness to make it stand out... I really like it... ![]() The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
Thanks for the feedbackThanks everyone for the encouraging comments and advice - I am cropping as suggested and like the result much better
Deb T ![]()
Cropped versionCropped - hopefully as suggested
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12727308@N05/1343755452/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1276/1343755452_cbe19efc0d.jpg" width="500" height="400" alt="macaw2 IMG_5731 cropped" /></a> Deb T
Re: Cropped version
Nope I don't think thats what we meant... well its not what I meant anyways... Only crop the bottom and the right hand side of the image...leaving the bird on the far right of the shot... that will leave some space for the bird to 'fly into'.... ![]() The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
I think you've cropped the right hand side too close to the birds tail. and you shouldnt have touched the left side.
Try this, crop the bottom so the feather is the same distance from the edge as the top feather is to the top edge. You could prob crop the bottom slightly more, but this is a starting point. Now crop the right hand side so the the centre of the birds right wing is about a 1/3 distance from the right hand edge. (still leave a bit of space behind the tail) I hope thats clear, Im hopeless at explaining like this .
Macaw cropped and burntOK - attempt #3 did my best to follow crop advice re bottom & r/h side
(with attempt #2 I was fixated with maintaing 6X4 ratio - no idea why upon reflection, put it down to newbie mistake) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12727308@N05/1352233944/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1099/1352233944_0e52b4f632.jpg" width="500" height="354" alt="macaw 3 IMG_5731" /></a> #4 have burnt the highlights out of foliage R/H side to hopefully remove distraction <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12727308@N05/1351428415/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1019/1351428415_f947b4d18a.jpg" width="500" height="354" alt="macaw 4 IMG_5731" /></a> What do you think - ready to print yet ? NB The reason I kept all of the foliage in the origional was it provided an interesting 3D blurred effect when printed - sort of like the old piece of plastic over the photo on the cards that came in the cereal boxes. But I am confidant that following the advice provided has produced a more technically correct photo and really has made a big difference Thanks all for your perseverence and assistance DebT
About time you posted a pic Deb
![]() Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|