Sharpness - technique over gearModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sharpness - technique over gearhate to bring up one of these threads
but i finally found someone who is the definitive reference to shrapness Randy Brooke ace runway photographer for over 30 years he usually shoots film but when he moved to digital he used a canon Digital Rebel XT with a sigma lens for fashion weeks around the world from technique he can produce better images than others using better gear like a markII at Ny fashion week he upgraded to a 5D with a sigma 120-300 lens he was kind enough to allow me to post one of his images note this one is a reject, most of his work is on an agency site he does use in camera sharpening but even though you can still see the quality of the image jpeg unedited canon 5D sigma 120-300 http://www.zeduce.org/images/fashion/runwayComp/randyBrookeMaraHoffman.jpg here is my best shot, this is as sharp as i can get with my newly calibrated d2x and 70-200 with my current technique around 1/250 ISO250 f4.5 http://www.zeduce.org/images/fashion/runwayComp/wendellRosaCha.jpg technique over gear anyday i assisted randy at NY fashion week as 2nd shooter and bag holder Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
wow his photos is damn sharp...!
did he give you some tips as to his techniques? you shot RAW wendell? thanks for sharing! Jonathan
for press we all shoot jpg for speed
also the photoeditors cant use raw to much time wasting speed is the name of the game shoot perfect and upload to getty the only things i learned from randy were he shoots higher iso to get higher shutterspeeds like 1/400 get crystal sharp runway images prob with that is nikons at high ISO produce lots of noise so i was always forced to shoot at 1/250, depending on how fast the mdoel walks and how shakey i am this shutterspeed can still produce blur at times randy shoots at ISO1600 1/800 f4.5 power to canons for better noise handling most of his tricks i guess is the way he focuses on the model tapping slightly on the shutter freuquently not relying on auto focus tracking systems back in the 80's he shot runway with film and a manual focus lens thats hardcore Last edited by wendellt on Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
thanks wendelit....... it is the same technique I use for shooting birds
![]() Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Thanks for posting, always interested to others' work. Both great shots too. I can't believe that was one of his rejects!! That would be on the top of my list..
His standards must be pretty high.. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
I see. Makes sense, and shows just how little I know about this stuff
![]() Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
If that is the case, it is gear over technique. The gear is allowing him to shoot at ISO 1600 and still get low noise. I'm not saying that he also doesn't have great technique, but I bet he couldn't get the same results with a currently available Nikon.
thanks for that Wendell.
Andrew, as you say, the ability to shoot at higher iso for the Canon is an advantage and it makes the photographer's life a bit easier. However, I suspect that even if he was using the same gear as Wendell, he would still get great shots, probably better then the Canon shooters too, he would just modify his technique accordingly. So technique would still win over gear, imho ![]() cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|