Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by chrisk on Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:38 pm
i'm trying to challenge myself, (well strobist is challenging me actually !), to come up with differen takes on common subjects by using different lighting. so, following on from previous flash experiments, this is another where alot of flash comes thru into the front element of the lens, (sb800 positioned to right rear of rose shooting up and towards lens at 45deg allowing the petals to diffuse most of the light), creating a kind of foggy diffusion. it makes it more subtle and the colour more subdued but still accurately records the deed red of the rose but not in the whole image. it's almost translucent where the bulk of the flash hits the image on the right.
i noticed how it makes the contrast between shadows and midtones even in the centre very smooth and seamless leaving no harsh shadows which is quite difficult in a rose macro where there are alot of floded petals. interesting result. i quite like it. any thoughts for improvements ?

EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Biggzie on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:20 pm
Its different. I like it
Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
-

Biggzie
- Member
-
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Mt Gambier, SA
-
by sirhc55 on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:26 pm
Rooz - I like this shot and the way you have executed it. Reminds me of a Spanish flamenco 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by colin_12 on Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:28 pm
Maybe a touch more DOF? You were probably going for soft and romantic though.
Apart from that it is the nicest rose shot I have seen in a long time.
Regards Colin
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by matt-chops on Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:25 am
Thats nice. I like the fact that the middle of the rose isn't in the middle of the frame (like a lot of flower macro shots seem to be, especially roses). I think that draws even more attention to the middle of the flower making it an even more predominant focal point. Draws the eye in nicely. Nice shooting. 
-

matt-chops
- Member
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: Southside, Brisbane
by Killakoala on Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:54 am
Great use of the colours of the flower. It works well.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|