Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by ewm3 on Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:42 pm
I am so envious of those with the D700! My new toy is the 80 - 400 Nikon VR Here are some pics I particularly like. I'm interested in which of the honeyeater pics is better and why. Look forward to some feedback. The first is more 'arty'  honeyeater 1  honeyeater 2 http://www.ericmapp.com/EWM_0813.jpghoneyeater 3 http://www.ericmapp.com/EWM_0814.jpg
Eric in Adelaide
Nikon gear but looking for talent...
-

ewm3
- Member
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:01 pm
- Location: South East Adelaide, South Australia
by DebT on Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Hi, honeyeater #1 for me - just like the angle of the head more as the eye contact draws me more into the picture DebT
DebT "so many dreams - so little time "
-

DebT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
by Marvin on Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:29 pm
I agree, I think number one for me too.
Nikon D7000
-

Marvin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.
by jase80 on Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:37 am
Another vote for number 3. Great colours.
D90 + 18-55VR + 55-200VR
-
jase80
- Member
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:55 pm
- Location: Bondi Beach, Sydney NSW
by ozimax on Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:34 am
Beautiful colours here, nicely done shot of the bird, whatever it is...
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by BullcreekBob on Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:15 pm
I can only see one bird photo, the first one - so I guess that's the best one.
Here in WA we call birds that look like that a Red Wattlebird.
-

BullcreekBob
- Member
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
- Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|