Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Remorhaz on Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:04 pm
Found this cactus covered in hard translucent spines in the succulent garden in the Royal Botanic Gardens and nestled within it's heart were these tiny buds. A helpful friend held a tri-grip diffuser overhead whilst I composed and took the shots for focus stacking. No issues with this "flower" swaying in the breeze  - I was lying on the ground with the tripod legs spayed out horizontally and these buds were probably only a few centimetres above the ground level. The result of stacking 12 frames [1/125 sec at f/4, ISO 110]  and for comparison a single image taken at 1/4 sec at f/22 ISO 100  I also found this Green Village hiding in a Purple Land (the heart of a Bromeliad I think) - this shot pretty much straight out of camera 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by stubbsy on Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:34 pm
Rodney
I quite like the last. Is there a focus stacked version?
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Remorhaz on Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:22 pm
stubbsy wrote:Rodney - I quite like the last. Is there a focus stacked version?
Unfortunately no - this was one of the few images I didn't stack  - at the time I was going for the shallow dof look
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by the foto fanatic on Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:43 pm
I assume the stack is actually the second image?
Good job on the blending but I don't find the subject matter very appealing - sorry.
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by Remorhaz on Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:06 pm
the foto fanatic wrote:I assume the stack is actually the second image?
Good job on the blending but I don't find the subject matter very appealing - sorry.
Hi Trevor - it's actually the first - in this case shooting the f/4 exposures instead of f/22 and not shooting all the way through the cacti means I get a quicker drop off to blur at both the front and back but a wider area of really sharp focus in the middle. This is different to most of the other stacked images I've done where I've shot more images all the way from front to back of an object.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by the foto fanatic on Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:20 pm
Remorhaz wrote:Hi Trevor - it's actually the first - in this case shooting the f/4 exposures instead of f/22 and not shooting all the way through the cacti means I get a quicker drop off to blur at both the front and back but a wider area of really sharp focus in the middle. This is different to most of the other stacked images I've done where I've shot more images all the way from front to back of an object.
OK - I think I can understand that now. Initially I thought "why bother" but now I can see that there is greater detail in the in-focus area. Thanks for that - I have learned something new about focus stacking.
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by colin_12 on Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:04 am
All nice Rodney but the Bromeliad (yes it is one) is the ducks guts. 
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|