Sunset with the 24-120vr

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sunset with the 24-120vr

Postby KerryPierce on Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:11 pm

Nikon D70 ,Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR
1/250s f/8.0 at 120.0mm ISO 200 hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby ajo43 on Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:19 pm

Most sunset shots are dull, dull, dull but yours is very appealing. It has all the elements that make a great picture:

- framing (the trees)
- foreground and background interest (water and bridge)
- colour (great red - postprocessed?)
- movement (the birds)

All in all a fantastic 9/10 shot.

Well done
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Greg B on Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:21 pm

Kerry, I think the problem with this shot is the blurred tree branches on the foreground, particularly on the right. I find them very distracting, and they have the effect of making the shot feel out of focus or otherwise not sharp.

The bridge and the chimneys and the smoke are all great with the low sun, and the birds are well caught. But the trees take too much away.

Just my opinion, others may take a different view.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby mic on Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:36 pm

One of the best I've seen.

Well done Kerry. :shock: WOW !

Very nice indeed.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby leek on Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:47 pm

I think it's a great landscape (and much better than all the dog photos :wink: )...

Nice composition, and as for the blurring in the front, I don't mind it... Just think of it as frontal boke :lol:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby KerryPierce on Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:53 pm

Thanks all, for the kind comments and critiques! :D

I tend to agree with Greg about the OOF branches, but there was nothing to be done about it. I couldn't use hyperfocal focus. The trees were only about 40 to 50ft from my shooting position. Hyperfocal focus for 120mm at the minimum aperture of f/22 only gives me 62ft as the near sharpness limit. Focus on the trees would have only given me 20ft of DOF, throwning the birds and bridge OOF.

So, what I did was focus on the large piece of ice, above and right of the birds. That gave me huge DOF to work with, even at f/8. While nothing in the shot is razor sharp, as a result of that, the shutter speed and f/stop allowed me to get "acceptable" sharpness ( less motion blur on the birds ) as a tradeoff for the things in the shot I deemed more important. :)

Leek wants to see more photos from the dog show? I thought y'all would be tired of those by now.... :P
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby phillipb on Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:06 pm

Kerry, I agree with Greg, maybe this sort of crop would help.

Image[/img]
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby KerryPierce on Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Thanks for the crop suggestion, Phillip. :) That does remove some of the worst OOF trees.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby mic on Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:55 pm

Nope, Still like the first. adds to the shot I feel.

Woof Woof :D

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques