Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by mateo on Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:48 pm
I was recently at the National Botanical Gardens... unfortunately a lot of pictures weren't too good because the DOF on macro is hard to get right hand held... and they wouldn't let me use a tripod because it was a weekend  ... but some of the out of focus shots turned out, rather nicely. Here is one of my favorites from the entire day actually:
There isn't really too much is in focus, just some of the stamens and pedals. The one right in front is a little blown, but I really like the image.... it has a sort of ethereal feel to it, like it's not quite there. Let me know what you think!
mateo
-

mateo
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: Candor NY, US
by storm on Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:56 pm
Like to colors alot. Although not all that sharp as you mentioned, it lends to a dreamy quality. Would love to get a macro lens!
-

storm
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:31 am
- Location: Jim Thorpe, PA USA
-
by dhess on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:49 pm
I really like the shallow depth of field but I think it would be perfect if you could get the flower on the right hand side sharp. BTW Which macro lense did you use and what aperture.
-
dhess
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by mateo on Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:07 pm
105mm Micro-Nikkor @ f/3.5 I believe. I am not sure how reliable iPhoto is, and Nikon Capture won't install on my computer for some reason, so I cannot get the RAW EXIF data.
mateo
-

mateo
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: Candor NY, US
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|