Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Reschsmooth on Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:37 pm
We had a bit of a portrait session today. Light setup in first photo.
Lights fired via SB800 on camera bounced off ceiling at about 1/32 power. Screen used as diffuser. Metz in background used as hairlight. I would have liked a fill light or reflector camera right at front, but none available.
In hindsight, not happy with the choice of top for Alicia.
C&C appreciated.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Geoff on Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:00 pm
Nice shots Patrick!
2nd image I'd like to see Alicia's face more evenly lit. Seems a little dark on HER left side. Fantastic you have Alex looking at you at the same time - not easy! Well done. Some more definition in Alicia's top would have been nice around the shoulders but not the be all and end all.
3rd image - Best one in the series - however on my calibrated laptop monitor it seems a litle too warm with the WB. What settings did u use for this/these shots? Flash WB or Auto? I've found that without tweaking the WB in PP, that when shooting with SB800 OFF camera that Auto WB can often (in my experience) be better. I guess this isn't always the case though.
Alicia's bicep region (her shirt) seems a little hot too, not a biggy - just a niggle.
4th shot - Cute! The shadows on Alicia's face on her left side let this down a bit but the intimacy and genuine happiness of this outweighs the technical hiccups.
Great to see you using the backdrop etc
Post more!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Reschsmooth on Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:58 pm
Thanks for the comments Geoff, and I agree, I needed some fill from Alicia's left side to fill in the shadows.
WB was on flash -3 (I remember what Gary was saying about auto WB with flash  )
Our main limitation was lack of space. I should have had the main light further to the front in the absence of the fill light.
Here are some more (click on image for larger views)
In hindsight, I am not happy with the pose, but I was happy with the hairlight
and a B&W conversion

Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by PiroStitch on Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:03 pm
The b&w conversions are great, however the first colour version has an issue with the WB. The reposted colour pics are pretty much spot on in terms of colour and WB (it's still a tad yellow on my screen) but best way to judge it is to print it out.
In terms of lighting, I prefer the reposted pics. It just seems more evenly distributed which shows much nicer tones in the image.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Wocka on Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:19 am
The first portrait of Alicia and Mini Reach is fantastic. Eye contact from both is the keeper. I agree a more even light on Alicia's face would be nice.
Cheers
Warwick ======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
-

Wocka
- Member
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|